Self-Doping and Electrical Conductivity in Spinel Oxides: Experimental Validation of Doping Rules
Source abstract
Abstract
Self-doping of cations on the tetrahedral and octahedral sites in spinel oxides creates “anti-site” defects, which results in functional optical, electronic, magnetic, and other materials properties. Previously, we divded the III–II spinel family into four doping types (DTs) based on first-principle calculations in order to understand their electrical behavior. Here, we present experimental evidence on two prototype spinels for each major doping type (DT1 and DT4) that test the first principles calculations. For the DT-1 Ga 2 ZnO 4 spinel, we show that the anti-site defects in a stoichiometric film are equal in concentration and compenstate each other, whereas, for nonstoichiometric Cr 2 MnO 4, a representative DT-4 spinel, excess Mn on the tetrahedral sites becomes electrically inactive as the Mn species switch from (III) to (II). The agreement between experiment and theory validates the Doping Rules distilled from the theoretical framework and significantly enhances our understanding of the defect chemistry of spinel oxides.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
NCSR Demokritos, Institute of Nuclear Physics,GR-15310, Athens, Greece
Nuclear Science and Instrumentation Laboratory, IAEA Laboratories, Austria A-2444, Seibersdorf, Austria
University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Rabe K. M. · Annu. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. · 2010 · 1 · 21110.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-103932 ↗
2. Krupicka S. · 1982 · 3
3. Zhang S. B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 8
4. Owings R. R. · Thin Solid Films · 2005 · 483 · 17510.1016/j.tsf.2005.01.011 ↗
5. Kawazoe H. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 2810.1557/mrs2000.148 ↗
6. Markovsky B. · Electrochem. Commun. · 2004 · 6 · 810.1016/j.elecom.2004.06.005 ↗
7. Alcantara R. · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 284710.1021/cm025556v ↗
8. Suzuki Y. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2001 · 31
9. Luders U. · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 1310.1002/adma.200500972 ↗
10. Mayhew L. E. · Nat. Geosci. · 2013 · 6 · 47810.1038/ngeo1825 ↗
11. Muhich C. L. · Science · 2013 · 341 · 54010.1126/science.1239454 ↗
12. Kumar P. V. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 567810.1021/jp309434a ↗
13. Ellmer K. · 200810.1007/978-3-540-73612-7 ↗
14. Xiao J. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 16
15. Paudel T. R. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 449310.1002/adfm.201101469 ↗
16. Perry N. H. · J. Solid State Chem. · 2012 · 190 · 14310.1016/j.jssc.2012.02.022 ↗
17. 10.1002/ adfm. 20130253510.1002/ adfm. 201302535 ↗
18. Perkins J. D. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 2010.1103/PhysRevB.84.205207 ↗
19. Ravel B. · J. Synchrotron Radiat. · 2005 · 12 · 53710.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
20. Sokaras D. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2013 · 84 · 05310210.1063/1.4803669 ↗
21. Waseda Y. · 200210.1007/3-540-46008-X ↗
22. Pickering I. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1993 · 115 · 1410.1021/ja00054a003 ↗
23. Martinez-Lope M. J. · J. Solid State Chem. · 2012 · 187 · 17210.1016/j.jssc.2012.01.009 ↗
24. Glatzel P. · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2005 · 249 · 6510.1016/j.ccr.2004.04.011 ↗
25. Bergmann U. · Photosynth. Res. · 2009 · 102 · 25510.1007/s11120-009-9483-6 ↗
26. Materlik G. · 1994