journal article·2019-06-11

Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Performance Silicon Anodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Romeo Malik, Melanie. J. Loveridge, Luke J. Williams, Qianye Huang, Geoff West, Paul R. Shearing, Rohit Bhagat, Richard I. Walton

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 31· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Maintaining the physical integrity of electrode microstructures in Li-ion batteries is critical to significantly extend their cycle life. This is especially important for high-capacity anode materials such as silicon, whose operational volume expansion exerts huge internal stress within the anode, resulting in electrode destruction and capacity fade. In this study, we demonstrate that by incorporating metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) with carboxylate organic linkers into Si-based anodes, a stable and flexible pore network is generated to maximize and maintain Li-ion flux throughout the electrode’s architecture. We show that the zirconium carboxylate MOF UiO-67 is a versatile comaterial to boost performance and mitigate the rate of anode degradation that presently limits the lifetime of Si anodes. The cage-like pores in UiO-67 and flexural properties of the 4,4′-biphenyldicarboxylate organic linker are proposed to create robust “ionophores” in the anode film to enhance longer term durability and performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Extraction and Separation Processes · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · University of Warwick · Faraday Institution

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.240986210.1149/1.2409862 ↗
2. 10.1149/1.240211210.1149/1.2402112 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.159691810.1149/1.1596918 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.014 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.007 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2014.610.1038/nnano.2014.6 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.05910.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.059 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.00110.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.001 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.151898810.1149/1.1518988 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.494870610.1063/1.4948706 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja401727n10.1021/ja401727n ↗
13. 10.1039/C5EE00762C10.1039/C5EE00762C ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.09.00210.1016/j.ccr.2015.09.002 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.5b0810910.1021/acsami.5b08109 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20140126910.1002/adfm.201401269 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.275407210.1149/1.2754072 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-018-19929-310.1038/s41598-018-19929-3 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.308626210.1149/1.3086262 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.165242110.1149/1.1652421 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat166810.1038/nmat1668 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.066 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.00410.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.004 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.0421608jes10.1149/2.0421608jes ↗
25. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
26. 10.1038/ncomms1188610.1038/ncomms11886 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
28. 10.1039/c3cc46105j10.1039/c3cc46105j ↗
29. 10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
30. 10.1021/jz400234510.1021/jz4002345 ↗
31. 10.1021/cm303399v10.1021/cm303399v ↗
32. 10.1039/C3JA50362C10.1039/C3JA50362C ↗
33. 10.1039/C4CP02324B10.1039/C4CP02324B ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.14410.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.144 ↗
35. 10.1021/nl204063u10.1021/nl204063u ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.15610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.156 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.01610.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.016 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.14910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.149 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.08710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.087 ↗
40. 10.1149/2.1221802jes10.1149/2.1221802jes ↗