Solvent Effects in Molecular Hyperpolarizability Calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular geometries, dipole moments, polarizabilities and first-order hyperpolarizabilities for five classic donor−aromatic π system−acceptor NLO chromophores were calculated, using semiempirical methods (PM3), in both vacuum and solvent environments. Solvent effects on the computed molecular geometries were found to be minimal. Dipole moments calculated for the molecules in vacuo showed good agreement with experimental data obtained in nonpolar solvents, but a substantial solvent dependence was observed for molecules modeled in a polar solvent. This dependence was very pronounced in the calculated first-order hyperpolarizabilities, β, where an increase of a factor as great as 6 was observed upon changing from a vacuum to solvent environment. Hyperpolarizabilities calculated for molecules in solvent were found to be in better agreement with experimental EFISH data than those calculated for molecules in vacuo.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Research · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Crystal structures of chemical compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Materials Science Graduate Program, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Chemla D. S. · 1987
2. Marder S. R. · 199110.1021/bk-1991-0455 ↗
3. Burland D. M. · SPIE · 1991 · 1560 · 111
4. Williams D. · J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Eng. · 1984 · 23 · 69010.1002/anie.198406901 ↗
5. Dalton L. R. · J. Chem. Mater. · 1995 · 7 · 106010.1021/cm00054a006 ↗
6. Kowel S. T. · IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 1995 · 7 · 75410.1109/68.393195 ↗
7. Kanis D. R. · J. Chem. Rev. · 1994 · 94 · 19510.1021/cr00025a007 ↗
8. Smith D. A. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 690310.1021/j100079a003 ↗
9. Matsuzawa N. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 254510.1021/j100061a008 ↗
10. Reichardt C. · 1990
11. Stähelin M. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 191 · 24510.1016/0009-2614(92)85295-L ↗
12. Robinson D. W. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 754010.1021/j100131a024 ↗
13. Yoshimura T. · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 40 · 629210.1103/PhysRevB.40.6292 ↗
14. Marder S. R. · Science · 1991 · 252 · 10310.1126/science.252.5002.103 ↗
15. Marder S. R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1993 · 115 · 252410.1021/ja00059a067 ↗
16. Meyers F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1994 · 116 · 1070310.1021/ja00102a040 ↗
17. Bourhill G. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1994 · 116 · 261910.1021/ja00085a052 ↗
18. Radeglia R. · J. Mol. Struct. · 1970 · 5 · 39910.1016/0022-2860(70)80045-X ↗
19. Buncel E. · J. Org. Chem. · 1989 · 54 · 79810.1021/jo00265a017 ↗
20. Sen R. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 190 · 44310.1016/0009-2614(92)85170-F ↗
21. Di Bella S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1994 · 116 · 444010.1021/ja00089a035 ↗
22. Maslianitsin I. A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 194 · 35510.1016/0009-2614(92)86064-O ↗
23. Onsager L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1936 · 58 · 148610.1021/ja01299a050 ↗
24. Stewart J. J. P. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1989 · 10 · 20910.1002/jcc.540100208 ↗
25. Stewart J. J. P. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1989 · 10 · 22110.1002/jcc.540100209 ↗
26. Hilderbrandt R. L. · Comput. Chem. · 1977 · 1 · 17910.1016/0097-8485(77)85008-0 ↗
27. Tsai C. J. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 1122710.1021/j100145a019 ↗
28. Klamt A. · J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 · 1993 · 79910.1039/P29930000799 ↗
29. Bondi A. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1964 · 68 · 44110.1021/j100785a001 ↗
30. Kurtz H. A. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1990 · 11 · 8210.1002/jcc.540110110 ↗
31. Singer K. D. · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1989 · 6 · 133910.1364/JOSAB.6.001339 ↗
32. Böttcher C. J. F. · 1973
33. Windholz M. · 1983