Growth Mechanism of Synthetic Imogolite Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
By controlling the surface effects during droplet evaporation of imogolite solutions, imogolite nanotubes were dispersed individually and directly observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the structure evolution of imogolite nanotubes in the synthetic process was investigated. It was found that the number of imogolite nanotubes continuously increased with time in the whole reaction. The average length grew slowly over time after a remarkable increase in the initial 24 h, and the length distribution experienced a similar variation with the polydispersity index always below 2. No appreciable changes in tube diameters were detected under TEM observation. The nutrient diffusion controlled kinetic formation mechanism is favored by our semiquantitative analysis of the experimental results. Adding nanotube “seeds” to a fresh reaction solution promoted further growth of the nanotubes. This served as a consolidated support to the proposed kinetic controlled mechanism.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Clay minerals and soil interactions · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Soil and Unsaturated Flow
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry and State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resources Utilization, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 5625 Renmin Street, Changchun, Jilin 130022, P.R. China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Cradwick P. D. G. · Nat. Phys. Sci. · 1972 · 240 · 18710.1038/physci240187a0 ↗
2. Farmer V. C. · Clay Miner. · 1983 · 18 · 45910.1180/claymin.1983.018.4.11 ↗
3. Bursill L. A. · Philos. Mag. A · 2000 · 80 · 10510.1080/01418610008212043 ↗
4. Mukherjee S. · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 490010.1021/cm0505852 ↗
5. Gustafsson J. P. · Clays Clay Miner. · 2001 · 49 · 7310.1346/CCMN.2001.0490106 ↗
6. Popov V. N. · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2004 · 43 · 6110.1016/j.mser.2003.10.001 ↗
7. Moniruzzaman M. · Macromolecules · 2006 · 39 · 519410.1021/ma060733p ↗
8. Ackerman W. C. · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 105110.1021/la00028a029 ↗
9. Imamura S. · Catalysis · 1996 · 160 · 13710.1006/jcat.1996.0132 ↗
10. Suzuki M. · Ceram. Soc. Jpn. · 2001 · 109 · 87410.2109/jcersj.109.1274_874 ↗
11. Yamamoto K. · Polym. J. · 2007 · 39 · 110.1295/polymj.PJ2006128 ↗
12. Miyauchi N. · Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. · 1966 · 12 · 187
13. Liz-Marzán L. M. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 1512010.1021/j100041a031 ↗
14. Oh J. · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. · 2007 · 18 · 893
15. Barrett S. M. · Eur. Polym. J. · 1991 · 27 · 60910.1016/0014-3057(91)90144-D ↗
16. Wilson M. A. · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2001 · 296 · 17210.1016/S0022-3093(01)00908-5 ↗
17. Farmer V. C. · Clay Miner. · 1979 · 14 · 10310.1180/claymin.1979.014.2.02 ↗
18. Yang H. · Chin. Sci. Bull. · 2007 · 52 · 230110.1007/s11434-007-0305-y ↗
19. Farmer V. C. · J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. · 1977 · 13 · 46210.1039/c39770000462 ↗
20. Deegan R. D. · Phys. Rev. E · 2000 · 62 · 75610.1103/PhysRevE.62.756 ↗
21. Deegan R. D. · Nature · 1997 · 389 · 82710.1038/39827 ↗
22. Li Q. W. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1392610.1021/jp061554c ↗
23. Mukherjee S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 682010.1021/ja070124c ↗