journal article·2009-06-23

Defining Reactivity of Solid Sorbents: What Is the Most Appropriate Metric?

Megan Winter, Dambar Hamal, Xiangxin Yang, Haidoo Kwen, David Jones, Shyamala Rajagopalan, Kenneth J. Klabunde

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 21· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

A series of solid sorbent materials, including alumina (Al 2 O 3 ), magnesia (MgO), titania (TiO 2 ), silica (SiO 2 ), and carbon, of widely varying physical properties, have been studied as sorbents for two toxic substances: sulfur dioxide gas (SO 2 ) and chemical warfare surrogate 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES, ClCH 2 CH 2 SCH 2 CH 3 ). Sorbent surface areas, average pore sizes, pore volumes, surface hydroxyl groups, and nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms were measured. Surface areas varied from 18 m 2 /g to over 1000 m 2 /g, pore volumes from 0.04 to 1.2 cm 3 /g, and pore diameters from 1.7 to 4.9 nm. Breakthrough studies of SO 2 and 2-CEES sorption yielded information about the effectiveness of each sorbent. Carbon samples worked well for 2-CEES but not SO 2, while silica samples were poor for both. The best MgO and TiO 2 samples were good for both SO 2 and 2-CEES, and overall, the highest surface area (459 m 2 /g) TiO 2 sample was the superior sorbent. The important features for an effective sorbent under the conditions employed are high surface area and high pore volume, possessing isolated surface −OH groups, mesoporous nature, and a polar surface (Lewis base and Lewis acid sites).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, and NanoScale Corporation, 1310 Research Park Drive, Manhattan, Kansas 66502

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao X. S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 63710.1039/B513060C ↗
2. Zhang H. · Soft Matter · 2005 · 1 · 10710.1039/b502551f ↗
3. Wakayama H. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 5 · 378410.1039/b305653h ↗
4. Zub Y. L. · Mendeleev Commun. · 2001 · 11 · 20810.1070/MC2001v011n06ABEH001486 ↗
5. Tanaka S. · Chem. Commun. · 2005 · 212510.1039/B501259G ↗
6. Guizard C. G. · J. Mater. Chem. · 1999 · 9 · 5510.1039/a805867i ↗
7. Fernández-García M. · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 406310.1021/cr030032f ↗
8. Soler-Illia G. J. A. A. · Chem. Rev. · 2002 · 102 · 409310.1021/cr0200062 ↗
9. Barton T. J. · Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 263310.1021/cm9805929 ↗
10. Beck J. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1992 · 114 · 1083410.1021/ja00053a020 ↗
11. Kresge C. T. · Nature · 1992 · 359 · 71010.1038/359710a0 ↗
12. Zhao D. Y. · Science · 1998 · 279 · 54810.1126/science.279.5350.548 ↗
13. Zhao D. Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 602410.1021/ja974025i ↗
14. Branauer S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1938 · 60 · 30910.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
15. Barrett E. P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1951 · 73 · 37310.1021/ja01145a126 ↗
16. Rajagopalan S. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2002 · 8 · 260210.1002/1521-3765(20020603)8:11<2602::AID-CHEM2602>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
17. Klabunde K. J. · 200110.1002/0471220620 ↗
18. cKlabunde, K. J.Introduction to Nanotechnology, Chapter 1, pp1−13.
19. dKlabunde, K. J.; Mulukutla, R.Chemical and Catalytic Aspects of Nanocrystals, Chapter 7, pp223−261.10.1002/0471220620.ch7 ↗
20. Wagner G. W. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 511810.1021/jp000101j ↗
21. Wagner G. W. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 322510.1021/jp984689u ↗
22. Klabunde K. J. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 1214210.1021/jp960224x ↗
23. Koper O. B. · Chem. Mater. · 1997 · 9 · 246810.1021/cm970357a ↗
24. iKlabunde, K. J.Nanometer Sized Metal Oxide Particles for Ambient Temperature Adsorption of Toxic Chemicals. U.S. Patent 5,990,373, November 23, 1999.
25. jKoper, O; Klabunde, K. J.Nanoparticles for the Destructive Sorption of Biological and Chemical Contaminants. U.S. Patent 6,057,488; May 2, 2000.