journal article·2016-10-25

Gaining Insights on the H2–Sorbent Interactions: Robust soc-MOF Platform as a Case Study

Amy J. Cairns, Juergen Eckert, Lukasz Wojtas, Matthias Thommes, Dirk Wallacher, Peter A. Georgiev, Paul M. Forster, Youssef Belmabkhout, Jacques Ollivier, Mohamed Eddaoudi

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 28· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

We report on the synthesis and gas adsorption properties (i.e., Ar and H 2 ) of four robust 3-periodic metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) having the targeted soc topology. These cationic MOFs are isostructural to the parent indium-based MOF, In- soc -MOF-1a (for NO 3 – ), previously reported by us, and likewise are constructed from the assembly of rigid μ 3 -oxygen-centered trinuclear metal carboxylate clusters, [M 3 O(O 2 C−) 6 ], where M = In 3+ or Fe 3+ . Each inorganic trinuclear molecular building block (MBB), generated in situ, is bridged by six 3,3′,5,5′-azobenzenetetracarboxylate (ABTC 4– ) ligands to give the extended (4,6)-connected MOF, soc -MOF. In our previous work, we confirmed that the parent soc -MOF, i.e., In- soc -MOF-1a, possesses unique structural characteristics (e.g., vacant In binding sites and narrow pores with higher localized charge density), which led to exceptional hydrogen (H 2 ) storage capabilities. Therefore, charged MOFs with soc topology can be viewed collectively as an ideal prototypical platform to examine the impact of specific structural parameters on H 2 –MOF interactions via systematic gas adsorption studies. We infer that enhanced binding of molecular H 2 is primarily governed by the presence and type of vacant metal centers (i.e., Fe was shown to exhibit stronger H 2 –MOF interactions at low H 2 loading compared to the In analogues). These findings are evident from the associated isosteric heat of adsorption ( Q st ) at low loadings and inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experiments of the rotational transitions of sorbed H 2, as well as, temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) studies (for a select compound). The importance of localized charge density is also highlighted, where the extra-framework nitrate anions in the Fe- soc -MOF-1a (for NO 3 – ) facilitate enhanced binding affinities as compared to the chloride analogue.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Crystallography and molecular interactions · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Functional Materials Design, Discovery and Development Research Group (FMD3), Advanced Membranes and Porous Materials Center (AMPMC), Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue (CHE205), Tampa, Florida 33620, United States

Quantachrome Instruments, 1900 Corporate Drive, Boynton Beach, Florida 33426, United States

Sample Environment Department (NP-ASE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, D-14109 Berlin, Germany

Department of Structural Chemistry, University of Milan, 21 Via G. Venzian, I-20133 Milano, Italy

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Box 454330, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, United States

Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, 38042 Cedex, France

Funding

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. MacGillivray L. R. · 201010.1002/9780470606858 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.106720810.1126/science.1067208 ↗
3. 10.1039/B618320B10.1039/B618320B ↗
4. 10.1021/cr990043210.1021/cr9900432 ↗
5. 10.1021/ar000034b10.1021/ar000034b ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20030061010.1002/anie.200300610 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20120480610.1002/anie.201204806 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja500646510.1021/ja5006465 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja305563910.1021/ja3055639 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja304928210.1021/ja3049282 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja403994u10.1021/ja403994u ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.5b0705310.1021/jacs.5b07053 ↗
13. 10.1039/C2CY00376G10.1039/C2CY00376G ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0068910.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00689 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.12.01610.1016/j.micromeso.2010.12.016 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms522810.1038/ncomms5228 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.121754410.1126/science.1217544 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja511495j10.1021/ja511495j ↗
19. 10.1038/nature1189310.1038/nature11893 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja205658j10.1021/ja205658j ↗
21. 10.1021/ja401429x10.1021/ja401429x ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.090971810610.1073/pnas.0909718106 ↗
23. 10.1002/chem.20140289510.1002/chem.201402895 ↗
24. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.5b0083810.1021/jacs.5b00838 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp512596u10.1021/jp512596u ↗
27. 10.1021/ja512311a10.1021/ja512311a ↗
28. 10.1039/C4CC07920E10.1039/C4CC07920E ↗
29. 10.1021/ar500312610.1021/ar5003126 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.06.01410.1016/j.micromeso.2009.06.014 ↗
31. 10.1038/3510463410.1038/35104634 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja310173e10.1021/ja310173e ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20060430610.1002/anie.200604306 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja903287v10.1021/ja903287v ↗
35. 10.1039/b802256a10.1039/b802256a ↗
36. 10.1039/c1ee01240a10.1039/c1ee01240a ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20046278610.1002/anie.200462786 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.108344010.1126/science.1083440 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja058213h10.1021/ja058213h ↗
40. 10.1021/cr200274s10.1021/cr200274s ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.01110.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.011 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.09.02510.1016/j.micromeso.2014.09.025 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4TA07197B10.1039/C4TA07197B ↗
44. 10.1021/ja510132310.1021/ja5101323 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.02.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2010.02.023 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja065685310.1021/ja0656853 ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20060436210.1002/anie.200604362 ↗
48. 10.1039/c0sc00179a10.1039/c0sc00179a ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20120120210.1002/anie.201201202 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja807023q10.1021/ja807023q ↗
51. 10.1021/ic900475q10.1021/ic900475q ↗
52. 10.1021/ja803492q10.1021/ja803492q ↗
53. 10.1021/cg501810410.1021/cg5018104 ↗