Electronic Structure of Si-Doped BN Nanotubes Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and First-Principles Calculation
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicon (Si)-doped multiwalled boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) were synthesized via thermal chemical vapor deposition. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy revealed that 5% of Si atoms were homogeneously doped into the BNNTs. X-ray absorption and photoelectron spectroscopy measurements demonstrated that the Si−B and Si−N bonding structures are produced, where both structures reduce the π bonding states of the BN sheets. The valence band analysis indicates that the Si doping decreases the band gap by about 1.7 eV. The first principles calculation of the Si-doped double-walled BNNTs suggests two distinctive doping structures; contiguous Si−Si bonding structures along the tube axis and a local hollow nitrogen-rich pyridine-like structure with a lone electron pair. It also predicts that the 4% Si-doped defective structures reduce the band gap of the BNNTs by 1.6 eV, which is in qualitative agreement with our experimental results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Korea University, Jochiwon, Chungnam 339-700, Korea, Department of Chemistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Chonnam 500-757, Korea, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory and Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science & Technology, San 31 Hyojadong, Pohang 790-784, Korea, and Department of Nano and Advanced Materials, College of Engineering, Jeonju University, Chonju, Chonbuk 560-709, Korea
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Iijima S. · Nature · 1991 · 56 · 354
2. Rubio A. · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 508110.1103/PhysRevB.49.5081 ↗
3. Chopra N. G. · Science · 1995 · 269 · 96610.1126/science.269.5226.966 ↗
4. Arenal R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 12760110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.127601 ↗
5. Wirtz L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 12610410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.126104 ↗
6. Liu A. Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39 · 176010.1103/PhysRevB.39.1760 ↗
7. Miyamoto Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 497610.1103/PhysRevB.50.4976 ↗
8. Watanabe M. O. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 18710.1103/PhysRevLett.77.187 ↗
9. Chen Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 240610.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2406 ↗
10. Blase X. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 19710.1063/1.118354 ↗
11. Enyashin A. N. · Carbon · 2004 · 42 · 208110.1016/j.carbon.2004.04.014 ↗
12. Wu J. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 64710.1021/nl049862e ↗
13. Golberg D. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2005 · 14 · 185710.1016/j.diamond.2005.06.029 ↗
14. Wang W. L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 653010.1021/ja0606733 ↗
15. Kim S. Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 170510.1021/ja067592r ↗
16. Baierle R. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 08541310.1103/PhysRevB.64.085413 ↗
17. Fagan S. B. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2003 · 12 · 86110.1016/S0925-9635(02)00394-1 ↗
18. Fagan S. B. · Phys. Rev. B. · 2003 · 67 · 03340510.1103/PhysRevB.67.033405 ↗
19. Zhou J. · Chin. Sci. Bull. · 2005 · 50 · 182310.1360/982005-470 ↗
20. Avramov P. V. · Phys. Rev. B. · 2006 · 74 · 24541710.1103/PhysRevB.74.245417 ↗
21. Guerini S. · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2004 · 38 · 51510.1140/epjb/e2004-00146-5 ↗
22. Si M. S. · Europhys. Lett. · 2006 · 76 · 66410.1209/epl/i2006-10314-3 ↗
23. Griebel M. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2007 · 39 · 50210.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.013 ↗
24. Xu S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 01311510.1063/1.2429904 ↗
25. Fan Y. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2006 · 89 · 74010.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00761.x ↗
26. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
27. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
29. Golberg D. · Solid State Commun. · 2000 · 116 · 110.1016/S0038-1098(00)00281-7 ↗
30. Okada S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 16541010.1103/PhysRevB.65.165410 ↗
31. Egerton R. F. · 199610.1007/978-1-4757-5099-7 ↗
32. Nemanich R. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 634810.1103/PhysRevB.23.6348 ↗
33. Choi H. C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 700710.1021/jp0464425 ↗
34. Zhi C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 21311010.1063/1.1938002 ↗
35. Xu Z. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 361510.1002/adma.200800830 ↗
36. Huheey, J. E.; Keiter, E. A.; Keiter, R. L.Inorganic Chemistry;Harper Collins College Publishers:New York, 1993; pA-31.
37. Zobelli A. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 195510.1021/nl061081l ↗
38. Grun R. · Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B · 1979 · 35 · 80010.1107/S0567740879004933 ↗
39. It is well known that the LDA underestimates the bandgap. This is the major reason why the band gap (= 1.9 eV) of the pristine (12,0)@(20,0) BNNTs is significantly smaller than that (= 5.6 eV) of the MW BNNTs experimentally observed in this work. However, it should also be noted that the gap decreases with increasing curvature of the tube. DW BNNTs with diameters much larger than those for the (12,0)@(20,0) tube can have a significantly larger band gap. A similar argument holds for Si-doped BNNTs.