journal article·2006-02-01

Factors Contributing to Binding-Site Imperfections in Imprinted Polymers

Irena Yungerman, Simcha Srebnik

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 18· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The quality of molecularly imprinted polymers depends on the ability to form molecule-specific recognition sites within the host gel. We investigate the imprinting quality of cross-linked polymer networks using molecular dynamics simulations through a topological analysis of the imprinted network configuration before and after removal of the templates. We define a measure for the quality of the imprinted polymer on the basis of the shape and size of the imprinting-induced binding sites. Low qualities of the imprinted gels are attributed to aggregation of the templates in the prepolymerization solution, aggregation of the imprinting-induced sites with small pores inherent to the gel, and deformation of the binding sites due to relaxation of the gel after removal of the templates. The formation of distinct individual cavities that retain the size and shape of the template is enhanced by high degrees of cross-linking and low template concentrations, in agreement with experimental observations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical chemistry methods development · Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis · Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, TechnionIsrael Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel 32000

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Arshady R. · Makromol. Chem. · 1981 · 182 · 68710.1002/macp.1981.021820240 ↗
2. Haupt K. · Trends Biotechnol. · 1998 · 16 · 46810.1016/S0167-7799(98)01222-0 ↗
3. Piletsky S. A. · J. Membr. Sci. · 1999 · 157 · 26310.1016/S0376-7388(99)00007-1 ↗
4. Freemantle M. · Chem. Eng. News · 2000 · 78 · 3110.1021/cen-v078n002.p031 ↗
5. Kempe M. · J. Chromatogr., A · 1995 · 694 · 310.1016/0021-9673(94)01070-U ↗
6. Ratner B. D. · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 1999 · 4 · 39510.1016/S1359-0286(99)00047-9 ↗
7. Byrne M. E. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2002 · 54 · 14910.1016/S0169-409X(01)00246-0 ↗
8. Shea K. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1986 · 108 · 109110.1021/ja00265a046 ↗
9. Shea K. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1989 · 111 · 344210.1021/ja00191a059 ↗
10. Turner N. W. · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2004 · 20 · 106010.1016/j.bios.2004.06.052 ↗
11. Baggiani C. · Talanta · 2004 · 62 · 102910.1016/j.talanta.2003.10.027 ↗
12. Andersson H. S. · Bioorg. Chem. · 1997 · 25 · 20310.1006/bioo.1997.1067 ↗
13. Andersson H. S. · J. Chromatogr., A · 1999 · 848 · 3910.1016/S0021-9673(99)00483-5 ↗
14. Chen W. Y. · J. Chromatogr., A · 2001 · 923 · 110.1016/S0021-9673(01)00971-2 ↗
15. Ansell R. J. · Analyst · 2005 · 130 · 17910.1039/B408751H ↗
16. Fish W. P. · J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Tech. · 2005 · 28 · 110.1081/JLC-200038551 ↗
17. Berglund J. · Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. · 1996 · 6 · 223710.1016/0960-894X(96)00406-4 ↗
18. Sellergren B. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1988 · 110 · 585310.1021/ja00225a041 ↗
19. Andersson L. I. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1995 · 92 · 478810.1073/pnas.92.11.4788 ↗
20. Andersson H. S. · J. Mol. Recognit. · 1996 · 9 · 67510.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199634/12)9:5/6<675::AID-JMR320>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
21. Wulff G. · Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol., Sect. A · 1996 · 276 · 110.1080/10587259608039352 ↗
22. Matsui J. · Anal. Sci. · 1998 · 14 · 69910.2116/analsci.14.699 ↗
23. Piletsky S. A. · J. Mol. Recognit. · 1998 · 11 · 9410.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199812)11:1/6<94::AID-JMR398>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
24. Zhang T. L. · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2001 · 450 · 5310.1016/S0003-2670(01)01390-3 ↗
25. Huang X. D. · J. Mol. Recognit. · 2003 · 16 · 40610.1002/jmr.627 ↗
26. Oral E. · Polymer · 2004 · 45 · 616310.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.059 ↗
27. Byrne M. E. · Polym. Adv. Technol. · 2002 · 13 · 79810.1002/pat.272 ↗
28. Yilmaz E. · Anal. Commun. · 1999 · 36 · 16710.1039/a901339c ↗
29. Yu C. · J. Chromatogr., A · 2000 · 888 · 6310.1016/S0021-9673(00)00556-2 ↗
30. Yilmaz E. · Anal. Commun. · 1999 · 36 · 16710.1039/a901339c ↗
31. Nicholls I. A. · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2001 · 435 · 910.1016/S0003-2670(01)00932-1 ↗
32. Pande V. S. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1994 · 91 · 1297610.1073/pnas.91.26.12976 ↗
33. Enoki T. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 500010.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5000 ↗
34. Srebnik S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 1096710.1063/1.1480447 ↗
35. Srebnik S. · Chem. Mater. · 2001 · 13 · 81110.1021/cm000537b ↗
36. Srebnik S. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 88310.1021/cm034705m ↗
37. Wu L. Q. · Analyst · 2003 · 128 · 94410.1039/b212731h ↗
38. Subrahmanyam S. · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2001 · 16 · 63110.1016/S0956-5663(01)00191-9 ↗
39. Kroger M. · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1999 · 118 · 27810.1016/S0010-4655(98)00160-X ↗
40. We · Cem. Concr. Res. · 2003 · 33 · 21510.1016/S0008-8846(02)00889-X ↗
41. Wulff G. · Bioseparation · 2002 · 10 · 25710.1023/A:1021585518592 ↗
42. Sellergren B. · J. Chromatogr. · 1993 · 635 · 3110.1016/0021-9673(93)83112-6 ↗