journal article·2021-01-26Open access

Complex Relationship between Side-Chain Polarity, Conductivity, and Thermal Stability in Molecularly Doped Conjugated Polymers

Ban Xuan Dong, Christian Nowak, Jonathan W. Onorato, Tengzhou Ma, Jens Niklas, Oleg G. Poluektov, Garrett Grocke, Mark F. DiTusa, Fernando A. Escobedo, Christine K. Luscombe, Paul F. Nealey, Shrayesh N. Patel

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 33· Issue 2

Abstract

Molecularly doped conjugated polymers with polar side chains are an emerging class of conducting materials exhibiting enhanced and thermally stable conductivity. Here, we study the electronic conductivity (σ) and the corresponding thermal stability of two polythiophene derivatives comprising oligoethylene glycol side chains: one having oxygen attached to the thiophene ring (poly(3-(methoxyethoxyethoxy)thiophene) (P3MEET)) and the other having a methylene spacer between the oxygen and the thiophene ring (poly(3-(methoxyethoxyethoxymethyl)thiophene) (P3MEEMT)). Thin films were vapor-doped with fluorinated derivatives of tetracyanoquinodimethane (FnTCNQ, n = 4, 2, 1) to determine the role of dopant strength (electron affinity) in maximum achievable σ. Specifically, when vapor doping with F4TCNQ, P3MEET achieved a substantially higher σ of 37.1 ± 10.1 S/cm compared to a σ of 0.82 ± 0.06 S/cm for P3MEEMT. Structural characterization using a combination of X-ray and optical spectroscopy reveals that the higher degree of conformational order of polymer chains in the amorphous domain upon doping with F4TCNQ in P3MEET is a major contributing factor for the higher σ of P3MEET. Additionally, vapor-doped P3MEET exhibited superior thermal stability compared to P3MEEMT, highlighting that the presence of polar side chains alone does not ensure higher thermal stability. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the dopant–side-chain nonbond energy is lower in the P3MEET:F4TCNQ mixture, suggesting more favorable dopant–side-chain interaction, which is a factor in improving the thermal stability of a polymer/dopant pair. Our results reveal that additional factors such as polymer ionization energy and side-chain–dopant interaction should be taken into account for the design of thermally stable, highly conductive polymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14953, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Borsenberger, P. M.; Weiss, D. S. Organic Photoreceptors for Xerography; CRC Press: New York, 1998; pp 1–755.
2. 10.1002/pi.197410.1002/pi.1974 ↗
3. Müllen, K.; Scherf, U. Organic Light Emitting Devices: Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Wiley: New York, 2006; pp 1–410.10.1002/3527607986 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20130434610.1002/adma.201304346 ↗
5. 10.1021/cr050149z10.1021/cr050149z ↗
6. 10.1080/1558372080223183310.1080/15583720802231833 ↗
7. 10.1021/jz300754p10.1021/jz300754p ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20130215910.1002/adma.201302159 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20160155310.1002/adma.201601553 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms258710.1038/ncomms2587 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0032910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00329 ↗
12. 10.1039/C2EE22777K10.1039/C2EE22777K ↗
13. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.5010.1038/natrevmats.2016.50 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.4440310.1002/app.44403 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat463410.1038/nmat4634 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5TC04207K10.1039/C5TC04207K ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0233210.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02332 ↗
18. 10.1021/nl302454c10.1021/nl302454c ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0484910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04849 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0096810.1021/acs.macromol.7b00968 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0105510.1021/acsnano.9b01055 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0519110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05191 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0043810.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.170043410.1126/sciadv.1700434 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0040210.1021/acs.macromol.0c00402 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20170265410.1002/adfm.201702654 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20170017310.1002/adfm.201700173 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20140107210.1002/aenm.201401072 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20130486610.1002/adma.201304866 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20190026610.1002/aenm.201900266 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.02.02910.1016/j.orgel.2016.02.029 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.5b0921610.1021/acsami.5b09216 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0067210.1021/acs.macromol.7b00672 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41586-019-1504-910.1038/s41586-019-1504-9 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20170093010.1002/adma.201700930 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41563-018-0263-610.1038/s41563-018-0263-6 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0525710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05257 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.6b0528010.1021/jacs.6b05280 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b0167510.1021/acs.cgd.5b01675 ↗
40. 10.1039/c8mh00921j10.1039/c8mh00921j ↗
41. 10.1038/ncomms956010.1038/ncomms9560 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.08520510.1103/PhysRevB.91.085205 ↗
43. 10.1039/C5TC04207K10.1039/C5TC04207K ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.15520610.1103/PhysRevB.72.155206 ↗
45. 10.1557/mrc.2015.7210.1557/mrc.2015.72 ↗
46. 10.1002/polb.2423710.1002/polb.24237 ↗
47. 10.1021/nn202951e10.1021/nn202951e ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20180368710.1002/adfm.201803687 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0082710.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00827 ↗
50. 10.1002/adfm.20170179110.1002/adfm.201701791 ↗
51. 10.1039/c8mh00223a10.1039/c8mh00223a ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0162910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01629 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1084510.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10845 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsami.9b2160410.1021/acsami.9b21604 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0198910.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01989 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja201310410.1021/ja2013104 ↗
57. 10.1002/aelm.20180091510.1002/aelm.201800915 ↗
58. 10.1039/D0TC04290K10.1039/D0TC04290K ↗
59. 10.1107/S160057671500443410.1107/S1600576715004434 ↗