Monolithic High Performance Surface Anchored Metal−Organic Framework Bragg Reflector for Optical Sensing
Source abstract
Abstract
We report the fabrication of monolithic dielectric mirrors by stacking layers of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and indium tin oxide (ITO). Such Hybrid Photonic Band-Gap (PBG) Materials exhibit high optical quality (reflectivities of 80%) and are color tunable over the whole visible range. While the ITO deposition is accomplished by using a conventional sputter process, the highly porous MOF layers are deposited using liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE), therefore yielding crystalline, continuous, and monolithic HKUST-1 SURMOF thin films with high optical performance. We demonstrate the optical sensing capabilities of these monolithic and porous Bragg stacks by investigating the chemo-responsive optical properties (PBG shift and modulation of the intensity of the PBG maximum) upon the exposure to different organic solvents.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), ‡Institute of Applied Materials (IAM), §Institute for Nanotechnology (INT), and ∥Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Funding
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung · China Scholarship Council · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kemling J. W. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 293410.1021/jz201147g ↗
2. Wang Z. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 788710.1039/c2jm15943k ↗
3. Li H. · Nature · 1999 · 402 · 27610.1038/46248 ↗
4. Yaghi O. M. · Nature · 1995 · 378 · 70310.1038/378703a0 ↗
5. Ferey G. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 138010.1039/b804302g ↗
6. Shekhah O. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2011 · 40 · 108110.1039/c0cs00147c ↗
7. Arslan H. K. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 422810.1002/adfm.201101592 ↗
8. Hinterholzinger F. M. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1035610.1039/c2jm15685g ↗
9. Wu Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 1251810.1002/anie.201104597 ↗
10. Lu G. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 444910.1002/adma.201102116 ↗
11. Redel E. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 135310.1021/cm1032964 ↗
12. Redel E. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 286110.1021/nn103464r ↗
13. Redel E. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 6810.1002/smll.201101596 ↗
14. Redel E. · Small · 2011 · 7 · 346510.1002/smll.201101906 ↗
15. Redel E. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · OP26510.1002/adma.201202484 ↗
16. Bundschuh S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 10191010.1063/1.4751286 ↗
17. Heinke L. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 146310.1021/nn405469g ↗
18. Dragaesser A. · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 66310.1039/C1CC16580A ↗
19. Farha O. K. · Nat. Chem. · 2010 · 2 · 94410.1038/nchem.834 ↗
20. Li J.-R. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 147710.1039/b802426j ↗
21. Liu J. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 230810.1039/C1CS15221A ↗
22. Yoon M. · Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 119610.1021/cr2003147 ↗
23. Eslava S. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 2710.1021/cm302610z ↗
24. Redel E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 09190310.1063/1.4819836 ↗
25. Talin A. A. · Science · 2014 · 343 · 6610.1126/science.1246738 ↗
26. Lu G. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 783210.1021/ja101415b ↗
27. Stock N. · Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 93310.1021/cr200304e ↗
28. Zagorodniy K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 25190510.1063/1.3529461 ↗
29. Lu G. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 397010.1002/adma.201202116 ↗
30. Schoenecker P. M. · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2012 · 51 · 651310.1021/ie202325p ↗
31. Rezk A. · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2012 · 55 · 736610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.07.068 ↗
32. Walheim S. · Macromolecules · 1997 · 30 · 499510.1021/ma9619288 ↗