Toward Standardization of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Studies of Li-Ion Conductive Ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Ion conductivity of ceramic electrolytes sets a limit to their use in batteries; correct analysis of this parameter opens a gate for further material optimization. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is the only way to characterize ionic conductivity, but the data obtained could vary from researcher to researcher for a number of reasons. Our goal was to propose a unified approach on the basis of both the published data and our own experience. We synthesized pure Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 and analyzed it using EIS, powder X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. We show how to (1) obtain reliable EIS spectra; (2) verify the equivalent circuit by adjusting the temperature; and (3) estimate the error of measurement via three approaches highlighting their use for special research aims. Finally, we summarized parameters that should be checked when describing results and benchmarking the results with literature. The article will be useful for those who work with ion-conducting ceramics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Energy Science and Technology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 3 Nobel Str., 121205 Moscow, Russia
Funding
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.01810.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.018 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.065 ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20160073610.1002/aenm.201600736 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm000600x10.1021/cm000600x ↗
5. 10.1021/cm200823p10.1021/cm200823p ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.01510.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.015 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp411101910.1021/jp4111019 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.06010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.060 ↗
9. 10.1021/jp013569a10.1021/jp013569a ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0486110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04861 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.022 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.125-126.8110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.125-126.81 ↗
13. 10.1021/ed080p106210.1021/ed080p1062 ↗
14. Lasia A. · 2002
15. 10.1016/0022-3697(69)90039-010.1016/0022-3697(69)90039-0 ↗
16. 10.1002/pssa.221063013110.1002/pssa.2210630131 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.04.01010.1016/j.ssi.2018.04.010 ↗
18. 10.1021/cm970648j10.1021/cm970648j ↗
19. Ohno, S.; Bernges, T.; Buchheim, J.; Duchardt, M.; Hatz, A. K.; Kraft, M.; Tsuji, F. How Certain Are the Reported Ionic Conductivities of Thiophosphate-Based Solid Electrolytes? an Interlaboratory Study. ChemRxiv, 2019, 11316497, ver. 1 (accessed December 19, 2019).10.26434/chemrxiv.11316497.v1 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00062-410.1016/S0167-2738(99)00062-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.19810.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.198 ↗
22. 10.1039/c1ra00383f10.1039/c1ra00383f ↗
23. 10.1007/s11581-007-0197-510.1007/s11581-007-0197-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.02210.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.022 ↗
25. 10.1515/zkri-2014-173710.1515/zkri-2014-1737 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22736710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227367 ↗
27. The FreeCAD Team. FreeCAD: Your own 3D parametric modeler. https://www.freecadweb.org/ (accessed December 15, 2017).
28. 10.1016/0167-2738(86)90031-710.1016/0167-2738(86)90031-7 ↗
29. Harvard Instructional Physics Labs. http://ipl.physics.harvard.edu/wp-uploads/2013/03/PS3_Error_Propagation_sp13.pdf (accessed September 6, 2018).
30. 10.1021/jp051181010.1021/jp0511810 ↗
31. 10.1039/C8CE02042F10.1039/C8CE02042F ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.1990002030410.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.00410.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.004 ↗
34. 10.1039/C6TA04492A10.1039/C6TA04492A ↗
35. 10.1002/celc.20130002210.1002/celc.201300022 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00062-410.1016/S0167-2738(99)00062-4 ↗
37. 10.1021/cm201512710.1021/cm2015127 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.220801210.1149/1.2208012 ↗
39. 10.1021/cm030422i10.1021/cm030422i ↗
40. 10.1021/cm021717j10.1021/cm021717j ↗
41. 10.1149/1.151728110.1149/1.1517281 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.279472510.1063/1.2794725 ↗
43. Barsoukov E. · 200510.1002/0471716243 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp405127510.1021/jp4051275 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0048610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00486 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.06210.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.062 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.02110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.021 ↗
48. Yang, J. Synthesis and Characterizations of Lithium Aluminum Titanium Phosphate (Li1+xAlxTi2-x(PO4)3) Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li-ion Batteries. MSMSE Thesis, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, U.S.A. 2017.
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.08110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.081 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.03710.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.037 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00459-810.1016/S0167-2738(00)00459-8 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0146310.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01463 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0158210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01582 ↗