Why Substitution Enhances the Reactivity of LiFePO4
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact of substitution at the Fe site in LiFePO 4 on reaction pathway, kinetics, and crystallographic changes upon electrochemical delithiation has been determined. Substitution was found by X-ray diffraction to reduce the lattice mismatch between the Li-rich and the Li-poor phases of the substituted samples as compared to the unsubstituted one. Substitution was also found, by monitoring the 200 reflection peaks of both the triphylite and heterosite phases, to increase the composition width of the single phase formed on lithium removal, Li 1 – x FePO 4 . A single phase was observed as high as x = 0.15 in Li 1 – x Fe 0.85 V 0.1 PO 4, whereas LiFePO 4 at the same state of charge and of similar particle size show the existence of two phases. In addition, the temperature at which a single phase is observed for the composition range 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 is decreased from slightly above 300 °C to ca. 200 °C. This increased single-phase-like behavior explains the enhanced kinetics of substituted LiFePO 4 and is consistent with a pseudosingle-phase reaction mechanism.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Extraction and Separation Processes · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemistry and Materials, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, United States
Chemistry Program, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States
Northeastern Center for Chemical Energy Storage, Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-3400, United States
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Hong J. · Electrochemical and Solid State Letters · 2009 · 12 · A3310.1149/1.3039795 ↗
2. Delmas C. · Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 66510.1038/nmat2230 ↗
3. Meethong N. · Electrochemical and Solid State Letters · 2007 · 10 · A13410.1149/1.2710960 ↗
4. Kobayashi G. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 39510.1002/adfm.200801522 ↗
5. Delacourt C. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 25410.1038/nmat1335 ↗
6. Malik R. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 58710.1038/nmat3065 ↗
7. Dreyer W. · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 10 · 44810.1038/nmat2730 ↗
8. Chen G. · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2006 · 9 · A29510.1149/1.2192695 ↗
9. Chung S. Y. · Nat. Mater. · 2002 · 1 · 12310.1038/nmat732 ↗
10. Herle P. S. · Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 14710.1038/nmat1063 ↗
11. Yang S. · Electrochem. Commun. · 2002 · 4 · 23910.1016/S1388-2481(01)00298-3 ↗
12. Morgan D. · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2004 · 7 · A3010.1149/1.1633511 ↗
13. Islam M. S. · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 508510.1021/cm050999v ↗
14. Meethong N. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2007 · 17 · 111510.1002/adfm.200600938 ↗
15. Meethong N. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 106010.1002/adfm.200801617 ↗
16. Meethong N. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 108810.1021/cm902118m ↗
17. Omenya F. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 473310.1021/cm2017032 ↗
18. Toby B. H. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2001 · 34 · 21010.1107/S0021889801002242 ↗
19. Larson A. C. · Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR · 2000 · 86 · 748
20. Gibot P. · Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 74110.1038/nmat2245 ↗
21. Yamada A. · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2005 · 8 · A40910.1149/1.1945373 ↗
22. Lin H. · Solid State Commun. · 2012 · 152 · 99910.1016/j.ssc.2012.03.027 ↗