A General Approach To Study the Thermodynamics of Ligand Adsorption to Colloidal Surfaces Demonstrated by Means of Catechols Binding to Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots
Source abstract
Abstract
A general strategy to study the thermodynamics of ligand adsorption to colloidal surfaces was established. The versatility of our approach is demonstrated by means of catechols binding to ZnO quantum dots (QDs). First, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to extract all relevant thermodynamic parameters, namely association constant, enthalpy, entropy, and free energy of ligand binding. Noteworthy, the determined Δ G of −20.3 ± 0.4 kJ mol –1 indicates a strong, reproducible, and exothermic interaction between the catechol anchor group and the oxide particle surface. To confirm the characterization of ligand binding by measuring the heat of adsorption, the free energy was cross-validated by mass-based adsorption isotherms. A combination of inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and UV/vis spectroscopy was developed to quantitatively determine the mass of bound catechols with respect to the available particle surface. The association constant K was determined by a Langmuir fit to be 2618 M –1 which leads to Δ G = −19.50 kJ mol –1 according to Δ G = −RT ln K . To close the mass balance, analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) was applied to detect the amount of the free, unbound catechol in solution. Finally, Raman spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) were performed to quantify the amount of remaining acetate from particle synthesis and to distinguish bound (chemisorbed) and unbound (physisorbed) catechol. Our results reveal that approximately 65 wt % of acetate is replaced, and physisorbed catechol will not affect the amount of remaining acetate on the ZnO surface. Moreover, no pronounced chemical shift peak as it would be expected for free catechol is observed by NMR at all. This indicates a highly dynamic adsorption–desorption equilibrium between the free and the physisorbed state of catechol on the particle surface. Our concept of combined analytics is seen to be a generally applicable strategy for particle-ligand interfacial studies. It gives detailed insight into thermodynamics, binding states, and ligand composition and is thus considered as an important step toward tailored colloidal surface properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses · Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Particle Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Cauerstrasse 4, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy & Interdisciplinary Center of Molecular Materials (ICMM), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Institute of Organic Chemistry, Henkestrasse 42, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Bisri S. Z. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 430910.1002/adma.201205041 ↗
2. Zhao L. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 435310.1002/adma.201201196 ↗
3. Tang J. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 76510.1038/nmat3118 ↗
4. Lee J. · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 231110.1039/C4TB00248B ↗
5. Déry J.-P. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 642010.1021/cm801075u ↗
6. Alvarado S. R. · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 263 · 18210.1016/j.ccr.2013.09.001 ↗
7. Cossairt B. M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 307510.1021/jz2013769 ↗
8. Tian X. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 397310.1021/jp908517j ↗
9. Wang Y. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 229310.1021/ja016711u ↗
10. Liang M.-K. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 411910.1021/cm501096p ↗
11. Bagaria H. G. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 773210.1021/la0601399 ↗
12. Chakraborty S. · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 772210.1021/la200787t ↗
13. Segets D. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 465810.1021/nn200465b ↗
14. Voigt M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 556110.1021/jp112079u ↗
15. Werner F. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 1467110.1021/jp102737a ↗
16. Williams E. S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 422710.1021/jp309896e ↗
17. Aldana J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 884410.1021/ja016424q ↗
18. Ip A. H. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 57710.1038/nnano.2012.127 ↗
19. Lesnyak V. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 290510.1039/C2CS35285K ↗
20. Shibu E. S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1216810.1021/jp800508d ↗
21. Ji X. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 572610.1021/ja710909f ↗
22. Kuno M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 106 · 986910.1063/1.473875 ↗
23. Park J.-W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 190710.1021/ja4097384 ↗
24. Lin S.-Y. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 213410.1021/jp036310w ↗
25. Ravi V. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 444210.1021/nl402315z ↗
26. Jelesarov I. · J. Mol. Recognit. · 1999 · 12 · 310.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199901/02)12:1<3::AID-JMR441>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
27. Keller S. · Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 84 · 506610.1021/ac3007522 ↗
28. Freire E. · Anal. Chem. · 1990 · 62 · 950A10.1021/ac00217a002 ↗
29. Grote C. · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 146410.1039/C1CC14630K ↗
30. Coppel Y. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2012 · 18 · 538410.1002/chem.201102050 ↗
31. Garcia Y. · Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. · 2012 · 2012 · 269110.1002/ejic.201200019 ↗
32. Fritzinger B. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 302410.1021/ja809436y ↗
33. Fritzinger B. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1019510.1021/ja104351q ↗
34. Hens Z. · ChemPhysChem · 2005 · 6 · 257810.1002/cphc.200500182 ↗
35. Benoit D. N. · Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 84 · 923810.1021/ac301980a ↗
36. Carney R. P. · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 33510.1038/ncomms1338 ↗
37. Nontapot K. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 15570110.1088/0957-4484/24/15/155701 ↗
38. Faber H. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 169310.1021/am2018223 ↗
39. Faber H. · Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 89710.1039/C0NR00800A ↗
40. Stubhan T. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 53210.1002/aenm.201100668 ↗
41. Wöll C. · Prog. Surf. Sci. · 2007 · 82 · 5510.1016/j.progsurf.2006.12.002 ↗
42. Gnichwitz J.-F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1791010.1021/ja106076h ↗
43. Calzolari A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 589310.1021/ja1101008 ↗
44. Calzolari A. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 1715810.1021/jp307117h ↗
45. Segets D. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 170310.1021/nn900223b ↗
46. Spanhel L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 282610.1021/ja00008a004 ↗
47. Walter J. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 887110.1021/nn503205k ↗
48. Amans D. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 513110.1021/jp109387e ↗
49. Woodill L. A. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2013 · 117 · 562010.1021/jp400748r ↗
50. Feng R. · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2002 · 123 · 19910.1016/S0368-2048(02)00020-8 ↗
51. Marczak R. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 466910.1021/jp810696h ↗
52. Klaumünzer M. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 672410.1021/am5004552 ↗
53. Engelhardt K. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2014 · 118 · 409810.1021/jp501541q ↗
54. Kirk J. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 592010.1021/ja030573m ↗
55. Aldana J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 249610.1021/ja047000+ ↗
56. Raymand D. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 689310.1021/jp300985k ↗
57. Yang L. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 463 · 9210.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.006 ↗
58. Trinchero A. · Biopolymers · 2004 · 74 · 12010.1002/bip.20057 ↗
59. Muldoon M. J. · Dalton Trans · 2009 · 39 · 33710.1039/B916861N ↗
60. Pierre M. C. S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1851110.1021/jp206243y ↗
61. Moreels I. · ChemPhysChem · 2006 · 7 · 102810.1002/cphc.200500659 ↗
62. Morris-Cohen A. J. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 115510.1021/cm302108j ↗
63. Gottlieb H. E. · J. Org. Chem. · 1997 · 62 · 751210.1021/jo971176v ↗