Structural Comparison of Hydrogen Silsesquioxane Based Porous Low-k Thin Films Prepared with Varying Process Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The structures of hydrogen silsesquioxane based porous low dielectric constant (low- k ) films (XLK) prepared with varying process conditions are characterized using a combination of high-energy ion scattering, X-ray reflectivity, and small-angle neutron scattering. We measure the film thickness, average mass density, density depth profile, wall density, porosity, average pore size, pore spacing, pore connectivity, and atomic composition. We compare samples with varying dielectric constants and degrees of cure or Si−H bonding fraction. The structural parameters are correlated with the chemical bond structure as measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The density profiles of the porous films were uniform, with a slight densification observed at the film surface. Films with similar k values but varying degrees of cure have almost identical structural characteristics. Lower dielectric constant films have larger porosities and average pore sizes but lower wall densities. The process conditions used to alter the dielectric constant affect not only the porosity but also many other structural parameters such as the wall density.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and devices · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, and Semiconductor Fabrication Materials, Dow Corning, Midland, Michigan 48640
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. The National Technology Roadmapfor Semiconductors; Semiconductor Industry Association: San Jose, CA, 1997.
2. Morgen M. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 30 · 64510.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.645 ↗
3. Nguyen C. V. · Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 308010.1021/cm990114d ↗
4. Hawker C. J. · Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 5410.1557/mrs2000.30 ↗
5. Kondoh E. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2000 · 18 · 127610.1116/1.591374 ↗
6. Mikoshiba S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 1999 · 9 · 59110.1039/a807068g ↗
7. Yang H. S. · Thin Solid Films · 1999 · 348 · 6910.1016/S0040-6090(99)00016-4 ↗
8. Yang S. · Chem. Mater. · 2001 · 13 · 276210.1021/cm0102786 ↗
9. List R. S. · Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. · 1997 · 22 · 6110.1557/S0883769400034229 ↗
10. Aoi N. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 36 · 135510.1143/JJAP.36.1355 ↗
11. Gidley D. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 128210.1063/1.126009 ↗
12. Dultsev F. N. · Electrochem. Solid State Lett. · 1999 · 2 · 19210.1149/1.1390780 ↗
13. Wu W. L. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 119310.1063/1.371997 ↗
14. Kohdoh E. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · L32310.1143/JJAP.40.L323 ↗
15. Jin C. · 2000
16. Deis T. A. · 2001
17. Tesmer J. R. · 1995
18. Bouldin C. E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 88 · 69110.1063/1.373722 ↗
19. Parratt L. G. · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 95 · 35910.1103/PhysRev.95.359 ↗
20. Lee H. J. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2001 · 148 · F19510.1149/1.1396338 ↗
21. Lodha G. S. · Appl. Opt. · 1998 · 37 · 523910.1364/AO.37.005239 ↗
22. Santucci S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 5210.1063/1.125653 ↗
23. Debye P. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1957 · 28 · 67910.1063/1.1722830 ↗
24. Wu W. L. · 2001
25. Liou H. C. · Thin Solid Films · 1998 · 335 · 18610.1016/S0040-6090(98)00881-5 ↗
26. Loboda M. J. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 286110.1149/1.1838726 ↗
27. Agaskar P. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1987 · 109 · 555410.1021/ja00252a058 ↗
28. Lucovski G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 28 · 322510.1103/PhysRevB.28.3225 ↗