journal article·2008-01-01

Tuning the Properties of Transparent Oxide Conductors. Dopant Ion Size and Electronic Structure Effects on CdO-Based Transparent Conducting Oxides. Ga- and In-Doped CdO Thin Films Grown by MOCVD

Shu Jin, Yu Yang, Julia E. Medvedeva, Lian Wang, Shuyou Li, Norma Cortes, John R. Ireland, Andrew W. Metz, Jun Ni, Mark C. Hersam, Arthur J. Freeman, Tobin J. Marks

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 20· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

A combined experimental and theoretical/band structure investigation is reported of Ga-doped CdO (CGO) and In-doped CdO (CIO) thin films grown on both amorphous glass and single-crystal MgO(100) substrates at 410 °C by metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Film phase structure, microstructure, and electrical and optical properties are systematically investigated as a function of doping stoichiometry and growth conditions. XRD data reveal that all as-deposited CGO and CIO thin films are phase-pure and polycrystalline, with features assignable to a cubic CdO-type crystal structure. Epitaxial films grown on single-crystal MgO(100) exhibit biaxial, highly textured microstructures. These as-deposited CGO and CIO thin films exhibit excellent optical transparency, with an average transmittance of >80% in the visible range. Ga and In doping widens the optical band gap from 2.85 to 3.08 and 3.18 eV, respectively, via a Burstein–Moss shift. On MgO(100), room temperature thin film conductivities of 11 500 and 20 000 S/cm are obtained at an optimum Ga and In doping levels of 1.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Together, the experimental and theoretical results reveal that dopant ionic radius and electronic configuration have a significant influence on the CdO-based TCO structural, electronic, and optical properties: (1) lattice parameters contract as a function of dopant ionic radius in the order Y (1.09 Å) < In (0.94 Å) < Sc (0.89 Å), Ga (0.76 Å), with the smallest radius ion among the four dopants only shrinking the lattice marginally and exhibiting low doping efficiency; (2) carrier mobilities and doping efficiencies decrease in the order In > Y > Sc > Ga; (3) the Sc and Y dopant d states have substantial influence on the position and width of the s-based conduction band, which ultimately determines the intrinsic charge transport characteristics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Materials Research Center, Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3113, and Department of Physics, University of Missouri—Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65409

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Coutts T. J. · Proc. Electrochem. Soc. · 1999 · 99 · 274
2. Coutts T. J. · MRS Symp. Proc. · 2000 · 623 · 19910.1557/PROC-623-199 ↗
3. Freeman A. J. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 4510.1557/mrs2000.150 ↗
4. Ginley D. S. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 1510.1557/mrs2000.256 ↗
5. Gordon R. G. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 5210.1557/mrs2000.151 ↗
6. Granqvist C. G. · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 411 · 110.1016/S0040-6090(02)00163-3 ↗
7. Hosono H. · Vacuum · 2002 · 66 · 41910.1016/S0042-207X(02)00165-3 ↗
8. Kawamura, K.; Takahashi, M.; Yagihara, M.; Nakayama, T.European Patent Application, EP1271561, A2 20030102, CAN 138:81680, AN 2003:4983,2003.
9. Kawazoe H. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 2810.1557/mrs2000.148 ↗
10. Lewis B. G. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 2210.1557/mrs2000.147 ↗
11. Mason T. O. · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 411 · 10610.1016/S0040-6090(02)00197-9 ↗
12. Minami T. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 3810.1557/mrs2000.149 ↗
13. Wu X. · Proc. NCPV Prog. Rev. Meet., Lakewood, CO · 2001 · 47
14. Coutts T. J. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2000 · 18 · 264610.1116/1.1290371 ↗
15. Coutts T. J. · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 5810.1557/mrs2000.152 ↗
16. Edwards D. D. · J. Solid State Chem. · 1998 · 140 · 24210.1006/jssc.1998.7883 ↗
17. Ott A. W. · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 58 · 13210.1016/S0254-0584(98)00264-8 ↗
18. Phillips J. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 67 · 224610.1063/1.115118 ↗
19. Wang A. C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 32710.1063/1.121823 ↗
20. Wang R. P. · J. Mater. Res. · 1996 · 11 · 165910.1557/JMR.1996.0208 ↗
21. Asahi R. · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 411 · 10110.1016/S0040-6090(02)00196-7 ↗
22. Babcock J. R. · Chem. Vap. Deposition · 2001 · 7 · 23910.1002/1521-3862(200111)7:6<239::AID-CVDE239>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
23. Jin S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 1378710.1021/ja0467925 ↗
24. Kammler D. R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 597910.1063/1.1410882 ↗
25. Metz A. W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 847710.1021/ja039232z ↗
26. Yan M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 234210.1063/1.1365410 ↗
27. Yang Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 879610.1021/ja051272a ↗
28. Zhao Z. Y. · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 413 · 20310.1016/S0040-6090(02)00344-9 ↗
29. Koffyberg F. P. · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 447010.1103/PhysRevB.13.4470 ↗
30. Burstein E. · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 93 · 63210.1103/PhysRev.93.632 ↗
31. Moss T. S. · Proc. Phys. Soc. A · 1954 · 382 · 77510.1088/0370-1301/67/10/306 ↗
32. Phatak G. · Thin Solid Films · 1994 · 245 · 1710.1016/0040-6090(94)90871-0 ↗
33. Reddy K. T. R. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1998 · 185 · 103110.1016/S0022-0248(98)80215-7 ↗
34. Matsuura N. · Thin Solid Films · 1997 · 295 · 26010.1016/S0040-6090(96)09283-8 ↗
35. Murthy L. C. S. · Bull. Mater. Sci. · 1999 · 22 · 95310.1007/BF02745685 ↗
36. Vigil O. · Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 361 · 5310.1016/S0040-6090(99)01061-5 ↗
37. Chu T. L. · J. Electron. Mater. · 1990 · 19 · 100310.1007/BF02652928 ↗
38. Gurumurugan K. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 113 · 42210.1016/S0169-4332(96)00840-9 ↗
39. Lewin R. · Vacuum · 1986 · 36 · 9510.1016/0042-207X(86)90278-2 ↗
40. Subramanyam T. K. · Phys. Scr. · 1998 · 57 · 31710.1088/0031-8949/57/2/032 ↗
41. Gulino A. · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 70410.1021/cm011175q ↗
42. Gulino A. · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 495510.1021/cm021183m ↗
43. Gulino A. · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 144110.1021/cm0112946 ↗
44. Wang A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A. · 2001 · 98 · 711310.1073/pnas.121188298 ↗
45. Schulz, D. L.; Marks, T. J.InCVD of Non-metals;Rees, W. S., Ed.VCH:New York; pp39–150.
46. Medvedeva J. E. · Europhys. Lett. · 2005 · 69 · 58310.1209/epl/i2004-10386-y ↗
47. Hinds B. J. · J. Mater. Res. · 1997 · 12 · 121410.1557/JMR.1997.0171 ↗
48. Jablonski Z. · Spectrochim. Acta, Part A · 1979 · 35 · 129710.1016/0584-8539(79)80080-X ↗
49. Utsunomi K · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1971 · 44 · 268810.1246/bcsj.44.2688 ↗
50. Wang A. C. · J. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 17 · 315510.1557/JMR.2002.0456 ↗
51. Lyding J. W. · IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. · 1988 · 37 · 7610.1109/19.2668 ↗
52. Cimino A. · Phys. Chem. Solids · 1960 · 17 · 5710.1016/0022-3697(60)90175-X ↗
53. Wimmer E. · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 86410.1103/PhysRevB.24.864 ↗
54. Asahi R. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 748610.1103/PhysRevB.59.7486 ↗
55. Dingle R. B. · Philos. Mag. · 1955 · 46 · 83110.1080/14786440808561235 ↗
56. Erginsoy C. · Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 79 · 101310.1103/PhysRev.79.1013 ↗
57. Frank G. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 1982 · 27 · 19710.1007/BF00619080 ↗
58. Bardeen J. · Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 80 · 7210.1103/PhysRev.80.72 ↗
59. Chen M. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 33 · 253810.1088/0022-3727/33/20/304 ↗
60. Zhang D. H. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 1996 · 62 · 48710.1007/BF01567122 ↗
61. Gilmore A. S. · MRS Symp. Proc. · 2001 · 666 · 10/110.1557/PROC-666-F3.10 ↗
62. Tahar R. B. H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 449810.1063/1.1509083 ↗
63. Taga N. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 80 · 97810.1063/1.362910 ↗