journal article·2019-04-09

Low-Potential Prussian Blue Analogues for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Manganese Hexacyanochromate

Samuel Wheeler, Isaac Capone, Sarah Day, Chiu Tang, Mauro Pasta

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 31· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) have recently shown outstanding electrochemical properties ascribable to their unique open-framework crystal structure that allows the reversible insertion of alkali ions with negligible perturbation to the framework itself. Many hexacyanoferrate materials have shown excellent properties and are some of the most promising sodium- and potassium-ion cathode materials in both aqueous and organic electrolytes. However, there is a distinct lack of candidate PBA materials that operate at low potentials, as their characteristic crystalline framework shows instability. In this article, we characterize the structure and electrochemical behavior of manganese hexacyanochromate, which exhibits reversible sodium insertion at −0.86 V vs standard hydrogen electrode (1.84 V vs Na+/Na) while maintaining the characteristic PBA cubic structure. This is the lowest redox potential of reported PBA materials and shows fast kinetics in a high-voltage water-in-salt electrolyte. Further reduction in potential in an organic electrolyte shows decomposition of the crystalline structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom

I11 Beamline, Diamond Light Source Limited, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

Funding

John Fell Fund, University of Oxford · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.01710.1016/j.joule.2018.07.017 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20187007910.1002/aenm.201870079 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl203193q10.1021/nl203193q ↗
4. 10.1039/C5TA10571D10.1039/C5TA10571D ↗
5. 10.1021/ja510347s10.1021/ja510347s ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms156310.1038/ncomms1563 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms400710.1038/ncomms4007 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms628010.1038/ncomms6280 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-018-03257-110.1038/s41467-018-03257-1 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20180251010.1002/adma.201802510 ↗
11. 10.1039/C4TA00062E10.1039/C4TA00062E ↗
12. 10.3390/batteries301000710.3390/batteries3010007 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.19952685110.1002/anie.199526851 ↗
14. Von Dreele, R. B.; Larson, A. C. General Structure Analysis Sytem (GSAS) ; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, 2000; pp 86–748.
15. 10.1107/S002188980100224210.1107/S0021889801002242 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)94793-510.1016/S0020-1693(00)94793-5 ↗
17. 10.1021/ic50206a03210.1021/ic50206a032 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0022710.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00227 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20140186910.1002/aenm.201401869 ↗
20. 10.1021/ic035271010.1021/ic0352710 ↗
21. 10.1107/S0365110X6200020110.1107/S0365110X62000201 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10973-017-6280-x10.1007/s10973-017-6280-x ↗
23. 10.1021/ic50071a00910.1021/ic50071a009 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.07.03010.1016/j.jssc.2008.07.030 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp311616s10.1021/jp311616s ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0113210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01132 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0062310.1021/acsenergylett.7b00623 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20170118910.1002/aenm.201701189 ↗
29. 10.1002/smtd.20180022010.1002/smtd.201800220 ↗
30. Bard A. J. · 1980
31. 10.1039/C4FD00147H10.1039/C4FD00147H ↗
32. 10.1002/ejic.20060013710.1002/ejic.200600137 ↗
33. 10.7567/APEX.6.02580210.7567/APEX.6.025802 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.02910.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.029 ↗