Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Computational high-throughput screening was carried out to assess a large number of experimentally reported metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and zeolites for their utility in hexane isomer separation. Through the work, we identified many MOFs and zeolites with high selectivity ( S L+M > 10) for the group of n -hexane, 2-methylpentane, and 3-methylpentane (linear and monobranched isomers) versus 2,2-dimethylbutane and 2,3-dimethylbutane (dibranched isomers). This group of selective sorbents includes VICDOC (Fe 2 (BDP) 3 ), a MOF with triangular pores that is known to exhibit high isomer selectivity and capacity. For three of these structures, the adsorption isotherms for a 10-component mixture of hexane and heptane isomers were calculated. Subsequent simulations of column breakthrough curves showed that the DEYVUA MOF exhibits a longer process cycle time than VICDOC MOF or MRE zeolite, which are previously reported, high-performing materials, illustrating the importance of capacity in designing MOFs for practical applications. Among the identified candidates, we synthesized and characterized a MOF in a new copper form with high predicted adsorbent capacity ( q L+M > 1.2 mol/L) and moderately high selectivity ( S L+M ≈ 10). Finally, we examined the role of pore shape in hexane isomer separations, especially of triangular-shaped pores. We show through the potential energy surface and three-dimensional siting analyses that linear alkanes do not populate the corners of narrow triangular channels and that structures with nontriangular pores can efficiently separate hexane isomers. Detailed thermodynamic analysis illustrates how differences in the free energy of adsorption contribute to shape-selective separation in nanoporous materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, 46241 Busan, South Korea
Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, MS 50F-1650, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Department of Chemical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium
Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi Arabia
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (66)
Show source-provided references
22. Baerlocher, C.; McCusker, L. B.Database of Zeolite Structures,http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/, (accessed July 2014).
29. Maitland G. · 1981
33. Siepmann, J. I.; Martin, M. G.; Chen, B.; Wick, C. D.; Stubbs, J. M.; Potoff, J. J.; Eggimann, B. L.; Mcgrath, M. J.; Zhao, X. S.; Anderson, K. E.; Rafferty, J. L.; Rai, N.; Maerzke, K. A.; Keasler, S. J.; Bai, P.; Fetisov, E. O.; Shah, M. S.; Chen, Q. P.; Dejaco, R. F.; Chen, J. L.Monte Carlo for Complex Chemical Systems 16.1;University of Minnesota:Minneapolis, MN, 2016.
37. Ruthven D. M. · 1994
41. Maesen, T.; Harris, T.Process for Producing High RON Gasoline Using CFI Zeolite. Patent US7037422 B2, 2006.