journal article·2012-11-13

Role of Ga3+ and Cu2+ in the High Interstitial Oxide-Ion Diffusivity of Pr2NiO4-Based Oxides: Design Concept of Interstitial Ion Conductors through the Higher-Valence d10 Dopant and Jahn–Teller Effect

Masatomo Yashima, Hiroki Yamada, Sirikanda Nuansaeng, Tatsumi Ishihara

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 24· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

We have investigated the crystal structure, nuclear- and electron-density distributions, electronic structure, and oxygen permeation rate of three K 2 NiF 4 -type oxides of Pr 2 (Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 ) 0.95 Ga 0.05 O 4+ δ, Pr 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 O 4+ δ, and Sr 2 Ti 0.9 Co 0.1 O 4 –ε, in order to study the role of d 10 Ga 3+, Jahn–Teller Cu 2+, and interstitial oxygen O3 in the high oxygen diffusivity of Pr 2 (Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 ) 0.95 Ga 0.05 O 4+ δ . The composition Pr 2 (Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 ) 0.95 Ga 0.05 O 4+ δ has a larger amount of interstitial oxygen O3 atoms ( δ = 0.31 at room temperature (RT)) compared with Pr 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 O 4+ δ ( δ = 0.19 at RT) and the oxygen deficient Sr 2 Ti 0.9 Co 0.1 O 4 –ε ( ε = 0.02 at RT). The interstitial O3 atom is stabilized by (1) the substitution of (Ni,Cu) 2+ by higher valence Ga 3+, (2) static atomic displacements of the apical O2 oxygen, and (3) local relaxation near d 10 Ga 3+ . Nuclear-density distributions of Pr 2 (Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 ) 0.95 Ga 0.05 O 4+ δ and Pr 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 O 4+ δ at high temperatures have visualized the −O2–O3–O2– diffusional pathway of oxide ions, which indicates an interstitialcy diffusion mechanism. Doping of the Jahn–Teller Cu 2+ in Pr 2 NiO 4+ δ stabilizes the high-temperature disordered tetragonal I 4/ mmm phase and makes the apical O2 atoms more mobile. The apical O2 is more mobile compared to the equatorial O1, because the longer covalent (Ni,Cu,Ga)–O2 bond is weaker than the shorter (Ni,Cu,Ga)–(equatorial O1) one, as evidenced by the experimental and theoretical electron-density analysis. The interstitial O3 is more mobile due to the lower coordination number (CN = 4) compared with the lattice O1 and O2 atoms (CN = 6). It was found that the minimum nuclear density on the O2–O3 pathway ρ N ( T ) is a useful microscopic parameter for the oxygen diffusivity. The ρ N ( T ) is regarded as the oxygen probability density at the bottleneck for diffusion. The oxygen permeation rate ρ P ( T ) increases with an increase of ρ N ( T ). The activation energy for oxygen diffusion estimated by the plots of log (the normalized oxygen permeation rate ρ P ( T )/ δ ) against T –1 (reciprocal of absolute temperature) is relatively independent of temperature as well as the formation energy of oxygen atoms at the bottleneck from the plots of log( ρ N ( T )/ δ ) against T –1 . These results indicate that the amount of interstitial oxygen δ is proportional to the carrier concentration for the oxide-ion diffusion. Doping of higher-valence Ga 3+ at (Ni,Cu) 2+ site in Pr 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 O 4+ δ does not change largely the activation energy for the oxygen permeation and formation energy of oxygen atoms at the bottleneck but increases the amount of excess interstitial oxygen (carrier concentration), which yields the high oxygen permeation rate of 262 μ mol min –1 cm –2 in Pr 2 (Ni 0.75 Cu 0.25 ) 0.95 Ga 0.05 O 4.13 at 900 °C. The present work demonstrates the design concept of interstitial ion conductors through the higher-valence d 10 dopant and Jahn–Teller effect.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-W4-17, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8551, Japan

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-W4-17, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8551, Japan

Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan

International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Malavasi L. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 437010.1039/b915141a ↗
2. Yashima M. · J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. · 2009 · 117 · 105510.2109/jcersj2.117.1055 ↗
3. Orea A. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 67510.1021/cm902687z ↗
4. Chroneos A. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 277410.1039/c0ee00717j ↗
5. Steele B. C. H. · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 34510.1038/35104620 ↗
6. ten Elshof J. E. · Appl. Catal., A · 1995 · 130 · 19510.1016/0926-860X(95)00098-4 ↗
7. Drioli E. · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2001 · 40 · 127710.1021/ie0006209 ↗
8. Chen Y.-C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 524610.1021/jp210271n ↗
9. Kharton V. V. · J. Mater. Chem. · 1999 · 9 · 262310.1039/a903276b ↗
10. Kovalevsky A. V. · J. Electroceram. · 2007 · 18 · 20510.1007/s10832-007-9024-7 ↗
11. Skinner S. J. · Solid State Ionics · 2000 · 135 · 70910.1016/S0167-2738(00)00388-X ↗
12. Ishihara T. · Solid State Ionics · 2008 · 179 · 136710.1016/j.ssi.2007.11.019 ↗
13. Yashima M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 139 · 276210.1021/ja711478h ↗
14. Ishihara T. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · B14110.1149/1.3251004 ↗
15. Nakayama S. · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 1999 · 19 · 50710.1016/S0955-2219(98)00215-5 ↗
16. Ali R. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 520310.1021/cm7035234 ↗
17. Kuang X. · Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 49810.1038/nmat2201 ↗
18. Jorgensen J. D. · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 40 · 218710.1103/PhysRevB.40.2187 ↗
19. Demourgues A. · J. Solid State Chem. · 1993 · 106 · 31710.1006/jssc.1993.1292 ↗
20. Sayagués M. J. · J. Solid State Chem. · 1996 · 125 · 13310.1006/jssc.1996.0275 ↗
21. Nuansaeng S. · Solid State Ionics · 2010 · 181 · 31510.1016/j.ssi.2009.12.014 ↗
22. Manthiram A. · Solid State Ionics · 2002 · 152 · 64710.1016/S0167-2738(02)00404-6 ↗
23. Yashima M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 238510.1021/ja909820h ↗
24. Tonus F. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 711110.1039/c1jm10445d ↗
25. Nakamura T. · Solid State Ionics · 2010 · 181 · 40210.1016/j.ssi.2010.02.002 ↗
26. Villesuzanne A · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2011 · 15 · 35710.1007/s10008-010-1274-7 ↗
27. Boem E. · Solid State Ionics · 2005 · 176 · 271710.1016/j.ssi.2005.06.033 ↗
28. Parfitt D. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 683410.1039/c001809k ↗
29. Toraya H. · J. Synchrotron Rad. · 1996 · 3 · 7510.1107/S0909049595015500 ↗
30. Nishibori E. · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2001 · 467 · 104510.1016/S0168-9002(01)00639-8 ↗
31. Ohoyama K. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 · 1998 · 37 · 331910.1143/JJAP.37.3319 ↗
32. Ishihara T. · Solid State Ionics · 2002 · 6834 · 70910.1016/S0167-2738(02)00413-7 ↗
33. Yashima M. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 85 · 292510.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00557.x ↗
34. Rietveld H. M. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 1969 · 2 · 6510.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
35. Izumi F. · Solid State Phenom. · 2007 · 130 · 1510.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.130.15 ↗
36. Izumi F. · Recent Res. Dev. Phys. · 2002 · 3 · 699
37. Momma K. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2008 · 41 · 65310.1107/S0021889808012016 ↗
38. Yashima M. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2005 · 38 · 85410.1107/S0021889805020583 ↗
39. Yashima M. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2006 · 89 · 139510.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00865.x ↗
40. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
41. Housley R. M. · Phys. Rev. · 1966 · 146 · 51710.1103/PhysRev.146.517 ↗
42. Allancon Ch. · Z. Phys. B · 1996 · 100 · 8510.1007/s002570050097 ↗
43. Odier P. · J. Solid State Chem. · 2000 · 153 · 38110.1006/jssc.2000.8786 ↗
44. Bresse N. E. · Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. · 1991 · 47 · 19210.1107/S0108768190011041 ↗
45. Chroneos A. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 26610.1039/B917118E ↗
46. Frayret C. · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 653810.1021/cm050195f ↗