Shape Memory Superelastic Poly(isocyanurate-urethane) Aerogels (PIR-PUR) for Deployable Panels and Biomimetic Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Shape memory polymers (SMPs) remember and return to an original shape when triggered by a suitable stimulus, typically a change in temperature. They are pursued as cost-effective, low-density, higher-strain-tolerant alternatives to shape memory alloys. Arguably, porous SMPs may offer the near-ultimate refinement in terms of density reduction. To that end, shape memory polymeric aerogels (SMPAs) may offer a viable approach. The necessary condition for SMPs is rubber-like superelasticity, which is introduced via cross-linking. Cross-linking is also a necessary condition for inducing phase separation during solution-phase polymerization of suitable monomers into 3D nanoparticle networks. Such networks form the skeletal frameworks of polymeric aerogels. Those principles were explored here with rigid trifunctional isocyanurate cross-linking nodes between flexible urethane tethers from four short oligomeric derivatives of ethylene glycol: H(OCH 2 CH 2 ) n OH (1 ≤ n ≤ 4). Formation of self-supporting 3D particle networks depended on the solubility of the developing polymer, which translated into specific combinations of the diol, monomer concentration, and composition of the solvent (CH 3 CN/acetone mixtures). Those parameters were varied systematically using statistical design-of-experiments methods. The skeletal frameworks of the resulting poly(isocyanurate-urethane) (PIR-PUR) aerogels consisted of micrometer-size particles. Bulk densities were in the 0.2–0.4 g cm –3 range, and typical porosities were between 70% and 80% v/v. Glass transition temperatures ( T g ) varied from about 30 ( n = 4) to 70 °C ( n = 1). At and above T g, all SMPAs showed rubber-like elasticity. They also became stiffer after the first stretching cycle, which was traced to maximization of H-bonding interactions (NH···O═C and NH···O(CH 2 ) 2 ). Below the T g zone, the elastic modulus of all formulations decreased by about 1000 fold. That property gave rise to a robust shape memory effect (SME), the quality of which was evaluated via several figures of merit that were calculated from tensile stretching data over five temperature cycles between T g + 10 °C and T g – 40 °C. All thermomechanical testing was carried out with dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The strain fixity was always >98%, pointing to very low creep. After the first cycle, strain recovery (a measure of fatigue) improved from 80−90% to about 100%, and the fill factor, a cumulative index of performance, reached 0.7, which is in the range of fast elastomers. The robust shape memory effect was demonstrated with deployable panels and bionic hands capable of mimicking coordinated muscle function.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri 65409, United States
Funding
BASF · Army Research Office
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat105910.1038/nmat1059 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0349610.1038/nature03496 ↗
3. 10.1080/1040843090350503610.1080/10408430903505036 ↗
4. 10.1021/ma100572e10.1021/ma100572e ↗
5. 10.1002/pi.319210.1002/pi.3192 ↗
6. Saunders J. H. · 1962
7. 10.2514/1.2285410.2514/1.22854 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:101467491297910.1023/A:1014674912979 ↗
9. 10.1002/jab.77001010910.1002/jab.770010109 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.106610210.1126/science.1066102 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00362-910.1016/S0142-9612(02)00362-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.08110.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.081 ↗
13. Hood, P. J.; Garrigan, S.; Auffinger, F.Method of Making and Using Shape Memory Polymer Patches. U.S. Patent No. 7981229B2, 2011.
14. 10.1002/mame.20050021110.1002/mame.200500211 ↗
15. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/5/05300110.1088/0964-1726/21/5/053001 ↗
16. Mock, C. C.Assembly for Delayed Lowering of a Raised Toilet Seat. U.S. Patent No. 8359677B1, 2013.
17. Kikutani, T.; Kondo, S.; Hayashi, S.; Sugihara, K.; Haguri, T.; Akimoto, K.Grip Member, Toothbrush Using The Grip Member and Western Tableware Using The Grip Member. U.S. Patent No. 6173477, 2001.
18. 10.1021/ja01349a00410.1021/ja01349a004 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.172960310.1063/1.1729603 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.170295510.1063/1.1702955 ↗
21. For an example of superelasticity, see:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rrPv5AlVXg.
22. Duerig T. W. · 1994 · 1035
23. Vernon, L. B.; Vernon, H. M.Producing Molded Articles such as Dentures from Thermoplastic Synthetic Resins. U.S. Patent No. 2234993, 1941.
24. Rainer, W. C.; Redding, E. M.; Hitov, J. J.; Sloan, A. W.; Stewart, W. D.Heat-Shrinkable Polyethylene. U.S. Patent No. 3144398, 1964.
25. Perrone, R. J.Heat-shrinkable Articles Made from Silicone Rubber–Polyethylene Compositions. U.S. Patent No. 3326869, 1967.
26. Wray, C. P. E.Elastic Memory Articles. U.S. Patent No. GB1075704, 1967.
27. Hayashi S. · 1988
28. 10.1299/jsmea1988.35.3_29610.1299/jsmea1988.35.3_296 ↗
29. Hayashi S. · Int. Prog. Urethanes · 1993 · 6 · 90
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.05210.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.052 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.002 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20090444710.1002/adma.200904447 ↗
33. 10.1002/marc.1996.03017080610.1002/marc.1996.030170806 ↗
34. 10.1002/pi.175310.1002/pi.1753 ↗
35. 10.1021/cm502054310.1021/cm5020543 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.2482010.1002/app.24820 ↗
37. 10.1021/ma302670p10.1021/ma302670p ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.03510.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.035 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.02710.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.027 ↗
40. 10.1021/ma021141j10.1021/ma021141j ↗
41. 10.1002/app.1993.07047052110.1002/app.1993.070470521 ↗
42. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990214)71:7<1063::AID-APP4>3.3.CO;2-110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990214)71:7<1063::AID-APP4>3.3.CO;2-1 ↗
43. 10.1080/0022234970821239710.1080/00222349708212397 ↗
44. 10.1021/cr010130610.1021/cr0101306 ↗
45. 10.1126/science.284.5414.62210.1126/science.284.5414.622 ↗
46. 10.1021/cm401623h10.1021/cm401623h ↗
47. 10.1039/c3ra43717e10.1039/c3ra43717e ↗
48. 10.1021/cm503144310.1021/cm5031443 ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20110356110.1002/adma.201103561 ↗
50. 10.1039/c1jm13664j10.1039/c1jm13664j ↗
51. 10.1002/anie.20130416910.1002/anie.201304169 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20060245710.1002/adma.200602457 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0047410.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00474 ↗
54. 10.1021/am201463510.1021/am2014635 ↗
55. 10.1021/am500685k10.1021/am500685k ↗
56. 10.1021/cm401623h10.1021/cm401623h ↗
57. Skowronski M. J. · Technical Papers-Society of Plastics Engineers · 1977 · 23 · 167
58. 10.1021/ma00175a00610.1021/ma00175a006 ↗
59. Modesti M. · Cell. Polym. · 1999 · 18 · 32910.1177/026248939901800503 ↗
60. 10.1134/S0965545X0905008310.1134/S0965545X09050083 ↗
61. 10.4172/2090-4568.100014810.4172/2090-4568.1000148 ↗
62. Polyurethane and Polyiso: the Difference? PIMA Technical Bulletin #202;http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.polyiso.org/resource/resmgr/technical_bulletins/tb202_jun30.pdf(Accessed Jan 18, 2017) .
63. 10.1021/jp511600410.1021/jp5116004 ↗
64. Montgomery D. C. · 2006
65. Goupy J. · 2007
66. 2013
67. 10.1039/C2SM27606B10.1039/C2SM27606B ↗
68. 10.3390/polym604114410.3390/polym6041144 ↗
69. Silverstein, R. M.; Bassler, G. C.; Morrill, T. C.Spectroscopic Identification of Organic Compounds,5thed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:New York, 1991; pp122–123.
70. Silverstein, R. M.; Bassler, G. C.; Morrill, T. C.Spectroscopic Identification of Organic Compounds,5thed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:New York, 1991; pp112and120.
71. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00083-510.1016/S0142-9612(97)00083-5 ↗
72. 10.1021/ma60056a04110.1021/ma60056a041 ↗
73. 10.1021/ma961035f10.1021/ma961035f ↗
74. 10.1295/polymj.3.11310.1295/polymj.3.113 ↗
75. 10.1002/polb.1986.09024070310.1002/polb.1986.090240703 ↗
76. 10.1021/ma00179a05510.1021/ma00179a055 ↗
77. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2034::AID-ANIE2034>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2034::AID-ANIE2034>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
78. 10.1039/b615954k10.1039/b615954k ↗
79. 10.1021/ma021141j10.1021/ma021141j ↗
80. http://www.reynoldsam.com/product/alja-safe/?gclid=CNaw_ciyw8kCFZI8gQod3JAGFQ.
81. http://www.aeromarineproducts.com/128-hgal-lp.html?gclid=CIHDjfm22ckCFQEcaQodUvsNyg.
82. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials:http://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D790-10.htm.
83. Standard Practice for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Properties: Determination and Report of Procedures:http://www.astm.org/Standards/D4065.htm).