Computational Evolutionary Optimization of Red Phosphor for Use in Tricolor White LEDs
Source abstract
Abstract
An evolutionary optimization process involving a genetic algorithm and combinatorial chemistry was employed in an attempt to develop titanate-based red phosphors suitable for use in tricolor white light-emitting diodes. An eight-cation oxide system, including (K,Li,Na) x (Y,Gd,La,Eu) y Ti z O δ, was screened in terms of luminescence efficiency. The use of a combination of a genetic algorithm and combinatorial chemistry enhanced the efficiency of searching, as it is applied to the screening of phosphors in a limited composition space. As a result, the optimum composition was determined to be (Na 0.92 Li 0.08 )(Y 0.8 Gd 0.2 )TiO 4:Eu 3+, the reproducibility of which was achieved by the conventional solid-state reaction method. Using the (Na 0.92 Li 0.08 )(Y 0.8 Gd 0.2 )TiO 4:Eu 3+ phosphor and an InGaN chip, a red LED was realized, so that the applicability of this new phosphor to white LEDs was confirmed. The luminescence of this phosphor was 110% that of the well-known scheelite variant phosphor and 600% that of a commercially available Y 2 O 2 S:Eu 3+ at an excitation of 400 nm.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Sunchon National University, Chonam 540-742, Korea, and Department of Advanced Material Science, Sangju National University, 742-711 Sangju Kyeongbuk, Korea
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Mills A. · Magn. · 2005 · 18 · 32
2. Schlotter P. · Mater. Sci. Process. · 1997 · 64 · 41710.1007/s003390050498 ↗
3. Sato Y. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 · 1996 · 35 · L83810.1143/JJAP.35.L838 ↗
4. Sohn K.-S. · Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 208110.1002/adma.200305291 ↗
5. Sohn K.-S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · H24310.1149/1.1808592 ↗
6. Sohn K.-S. · J. Comb. Chem. · 2006 · 8 · 4410.1021/cc050101z ↗
7. Neeraj S. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 387 · 210.1016/j.cplett.2003.12.130 ↗
8. Neeraj S. · Solid State Commun. · 2004 · 131 · 6510.1016/j.ssc.2004.03.050 ↗
9. Weber L. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 1995 · 34 · 228010.1002/anie.199522801 ↗
10. Singh J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 166910.1021/ja953172i ↗
11. Weber L. · Drug Discovery Today · 1998 · 3 · 37910.1016/S1359-6446(98)01219-7 ↗
12. Buyevskaya O. V. · Catal. Today · 2001 · 67 · 36910.1016/S0920-5861(01)00329-7 ↗
13. Wolf D. · Appl. Catal., A · 2000 · 200 · 6310.1016/S0926-860X(00)00643-8 ↗
14. Paul J. S. · J. Comb. Chem. · 2005 · 7 · 40710.1021/cc0500046 ↗
15. Sohn K.-S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · H18210.1149/1.1591756 ↗
16. Sohn K.-S. · J. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 17 · 320110.1557/JMR.2002.0463 ↗
17. Kim C. H. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · H21
18. Sohn K.-S. · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 214010.1021/cm0109701 ↗
19. Seo S. Y. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · H1210.1149/1.1425800 ↗
20. Sohn K.-S. · Electrochem. Solid State Lett. · 2001 · 4 · H2610.1149/1.1398560 ↗
21. Sohn K.-S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2000 · 147 · 436810.1149/1.1394071 ↗
22. Blasse G. · J. lnorg. Nucl. Chem. · 1968 · 30 · 65610.1016/0022-1902(68)80491-9 ↗
23. Berdowski P. A. M. · J. Lumin. · 1984 · 29 · 24310.1016/0022-2313(84)90024-3 ↗
24. Raymond E. S. · J. Solid State Chem. · 2001 · 161 · 22510.1006/jssc.2001.9303 ↗
25. Tezuka K. · J. Solid State Chem. · 1998 · 138 · 34210.1006/jssc.1998.7794 ↗
26. Toda K. · J. Alloys Compd. · 1996 · 234 · 1910.1016/0925-8388(95)01969-3 ↗