Thermal Behavior and CO2 Absorption of Li2-xNaxZrO3 Solid Solutions
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium−sodium metazirconate solid solutions, Li 2- x Na x ZrO 3, were tested as CO 2 captors. The thermal analyses of these materials showed that all the solid solutions present similar behaviors under air and N 2 . The samples lost weight due to two different processes, desorption of physisorbed water (∼100 °C) and a decarbonation process (400−700 °C). In fact, the quantities of water and CO 2 desorbed increased as a function of the sodium content. Thermal analyses into a CO 2 flux showed that Li 2- x Na x Zr 2 O 7 solid solutions present a high CO 2 absorption. The solid solutions absorb CO 2 between 400 and 600 °C, but samples containing the sodium phase absorbed CO 2 in two distinct steps. First, at low temperatures, there is a CO 2 chemisorption, only at the surface of the particles, forming a carbonate shell. Later, when the temperature reaches 400 °C, or more, a second absorption process takes place. In this process lithium and/or sodium atoms diffuse from the core of the particles to the surface, through an external carbonate shell. The differences observed in the CO 2 sorption processes were explained with thermodynamic data.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, CU, Apdo. Postal 70-360, Coyoacán 04510, México DF, and Departamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, AV. Michoacán y la Purísima, Col. Vicentina, Del. Iztapalapa, México DF, Mexico
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Ding Y. · Process Saf. Environ. Prot · 2001 · 70 · 4510.1205/095758201531130 ↗
2. Ida, J. I.; Xiong, R.; Lin, Y. S.Sep. Purif. Technol.2004,36, 41.10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00151-5 ↗
3. Ida J. I. · Environ. Sci. Technol · 2003 · 37 · 199910.1021/es0259032 ↗
4. Kato M. · J. Mater. Sci. Lett · 2002 · 21 · 48510.1023/A:1015338808533 ↗
5. Pfeiffer H. · Chem. Mater · 2005 · 17 · 170410.1021/cm047897+ ↗
6. Nair B. N. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc · 2004 · 87 · 6810.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00068.x ↗
7. Xiong R. · Chem. Eng. Sci · 2003 · 58 · 437710.1016/S0009-2509(03)00319-1 ↗
8. Mosqueda H. A. · Chem. Mater · 2006 · 18 · 230710.1021/cm060122b ↗
9. Nakagawa K. · J. Electrochem. Soc · 1998 · 145 · 134410.1149/1.1838462 ↗
10. López-Ortiz, A.; Perez-Rivera, N. G.; Reyes-Rojas, A.; Lardizabal-Gutierrez, D.Sep. Sci. Technol.2004,39, 3559.10.1081/SS-200036766 ↗
11. Pfeiffer H. · Chem. Mater · 2006 · 18 · 264210.1021/cm0600935 ↗
12. Bastow T. J. · Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson · 1994 · 3 · 4910.1016/0926-2040(94)90023-X ↗
13. Pfeiffer H. · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc · 2004 · 24 · 243310.1016/S0955-2219(03)00630-7 ↗
14. Cruz D. · J. Solid State Chem · 2006 · 179 · 90910.1016/j.jssc.2005.12.020 ↗
15. Choi K. H. · Chem. Lett · 2003 · 32 · 92410.1246/cl.2003.924 ↗
16. Binnewies M. · 200210.1002/9783527618347 ↗