Influence of Processing Conditions on Structures of 3D Ordered Macroporous Metals Prepared by Colloidal Crystal Templating
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents general methods of preparing three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) metals or alloys via templated precipitation and subsequent chemical conversion of metal salts (acetates, oxalates) within colloidal crystals of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or polystyrene (PS) spheres. Three approaches are given to prepare 3DOM metallic Ni, Co, and Fe and the alloy Ni 1 - x Co x: (1) calcination of the metal oxalate/template composite in a nitrogen atmosphere, (2) formation of a 3DOM metal oxide followed by reduction in hydrogen, and (3) direct reduction of the metal oxalate/template composite in hydrogen. The 3DOM products obtained by these routes differ in size of the grains that compose the wall skeletons, in surface areas, and in compositions. Method 1 leads to very small grains and high surface areas but incomplete removal of carbon with graphitic layers surrounding metal grains. Method 2, as a two-step process, leads to relatively large metal grains, smaller surface areas, and carbon-free products. Method 3 strikes a compromise in these properties, with intermediate surface areas and small (<2%) amounts of remaining carbon. This paper presents synthetic details, discusses effects of the template choice (PMMA vs PS), and compares structural features of the macroporous metals and alloys, using the results of XRD, TGA, SEM, TEM, nitrogen adsorption data, and chemical analysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, and Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Shapovalov V. · MRS Bull. · 1994 · 19 · 2410.1557/S0883769400039476 ↗
2. Rausch S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1996 · 143 · 285210.1149/1.1837118 ↗
3. Attard G. S. · Science · 1997 · 278 · 83810.1126/science.278.5339.838 ↗
4. Yan H. · Adv. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 100310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199908)11:12<1003::AID-ADMA1003>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
5. Jiang P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1999 · 121 · 795710.1021/ja991321h ↗
6. Velev O. D. · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 54810.1038/44065 ↗
7. Wijnhoven J. E. G. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 88810.1002/1521-4095(200006)12:12<888::AID-ADMA888>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
8. Miguez H. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 440510.1021/la991412s ↗
9. Egan G. L. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 104010.1002/1521-4095(200007)12:14<1040::AID-ADMA1040>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
10. Xu L. · Chem. Commun. · 2000 · 99710.1039/b000404i ↗
11. Bartlett P. N. · Chem. Commun. · 2000 · 167110.1039/b004398m ↗
12. Tessier P. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2000 · 122 · 955410.1021/ja0022831 ↗
13. Yan H. · Chem. Commun. · 2000 · 147710.1039/b003147j ↗
14. Sievenpiper D. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 248010.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2480 ↗
15. Liggat · 1999
16. Zou D. · 1992
17. Yan H. · Chem. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 113410.1021/cm9907763 ↗
18. Gregg S. J. · 1982
19. Holland B. T. · Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 79510.1021/cm980666g ↗
20. Robin J. · Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. · 1953 · 1078
21. Dollimore D. · J. Chem. Soc. · 1963 · 261710.1039/jr9630002617 ↗
22. Blanford C. F. Ph.D. · 2000
23. Nicholls · 1973 · 3 · 982
24. Bhatia, S.Zeolite Catalysis: Principles and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1989.
25. Gates, B. C.; Katzer, J. R.; Schuit, G. C. A.Chemistry of CatalyticProcesses; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1979; pp 274−275.
26. Nishizawa, T.; Ishida, K. InBinary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed.; Massalksi, T. B., Ed.; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, 1990; Vol. 2, pp 1214−1215.