Nitrogen doped ZrO2 thin films: synthesis and characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
To obtain ZrO2 and ZrO2+N2 thin films was used magnetron sputtering in radio frequency mode in a 10-6 mbar high vacuum deposition chamber. Silicon and carbon substrates measuring 12x15mm were used for deposition. The used magnetron system was composed of a single water-cooled cathode, provided with one circular targets of ZrO2 (2 mm thick and 50 mm in diameter) of high purity (99.95%). TDS Analysis of the films was performed. The desorbed species were observed with a QMG 220 Mass spectrometer provided with a W filament. It can be observed that in the case of the ZnO2 film, nitrogen desorption registers two maxima with signal intensity of 9.7x10-12 and 9.0x10-12, reached after 2000s and 4900s respectively. In the case of ZrO2+N2 film, nitrogen desorption shows a pronounced maximum with a signal intensity of 2.4x10-11 reached after 6000s. . The topology the ZrO2 and ZrO2+N2 samples deposited on Si substrates have been investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a FEI Inspect S scanning electron microscope ( Hillsboro, Oregon, OR, USA) in high-vacuum modes. For the ZrO2 deposition, the surface appears to have grain-like topology, with a mean dimension of around 150 nm. These structures do not appear for the ZrO2+N2 deposition. Instead, for the ZrO2+N2 sample, small blisters (between 300 nm and 1.000nm) have formed on the surface, as a consequence of injecting N2 during the deposition. Cross-section measurements were also performed to establish the layer thickness. The ZrO2 sample has a measured thickness of 1950nm, while the introduction of N2 gas for the ZrO2+N2 sample had a poisoning effect on the magnetron target that led to a decrease (5 times) in deposition rate, giving this sample a final thickness of 365nm (compared to 1950nm) for the same deposition The crystalline structure was investigated using X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) method. The experimental set-up was composed of a diffractometer equipped with a Cu-Kα X-ray sourse, with a specific wavelength of 0.154nm, in a Bragg-Bretano type geometry. In this way, a crystalline phase corresponding to ZrO2 with a group symmetry Fm-3m (225)-face centered cubic was identified. At the same time, it is observed that the films deposited in the reactive atmosphere show a pronounced amorphization, this most likely being due to the retention of nitrogen which leads to the modification of the network parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] Lu, J.; Zang, J. B.; Shan, S. X.; Huang, H.; Wang, Y. H. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4070−4074; https://doi.org/10.1021/nl801841r10.1021/nl801841r ↗
2. [2] Luo, T. Y.; Liang, T. X.; Li, C. S. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2004, 366, 206−209; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.05310.1016/j.msea.2003.09.053 ↗
3. [3] D.H Kuo, C.H Chien, C.H Huang,Thin Solid Films,Volumes 420-421, 2 December 2002, Pages 47-53; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00738-110.1016/S0040-6090(02)00738-1 ↗
4. [4] Liang, R.; Deng, M.; Cui, S.; Chen, H.; Qiu, J. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1855−1860; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.09.01610.1016/j.materresbull.2010.09.016 ↗
5. [5] Song, H.; Qiu, X.; Li, F. Appl. Catal., A 2009, 364, 1−7; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.04610.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.046 ↗
6. [6] Guo, D.; Qiu, X.; Zhu, W.; Chen, L. Appl. Catal., B 2009, 89, 597−601; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.01.02510.1016/j.apcatb.2009.01.025 ↗
7. [7] Javey, A.; Kim, H.; Brink, M.; Wang, Q.; Ural, A.; Guo, J.;Mcintyre, P.; Mceuen, P.; Lundstrom, M.; Dai, H. Nature 2002, 1, 241−246; https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat76910.1038/nmat769 ↗
8. [8]. Pal, K.; Kang, D. J.; Zhang, Z. X.; Kim, J. K. Langmuir 2010, 26, 3609−3614; https://doi.org/10.1021/la903022j10.1021/la903022j ↗
9. [9] Sun, Z.; Zhang, X.; Na, N.; Liu, Z.; Han, B.; An, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 13410−13414; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp061635910.1021/jp0616359 ↗
10. [10]. Shan, Y.; Gao, L. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 625−630; https://doi.org/10.1088/0957- 4484/16/6/00110.1088/0957-4484/16/6/001 ↗
11. [11] Lupo, F.; Kamalakaran, R.; Scheu, C.; Grobert, N.; Ruhle, M. Carbon 2004, 42, 1995−1999; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.03710.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.037 ↗
12. [12] Banerjee, S.; Hemraj-Benny, T.; Wong, S. S. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 17−29; https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20040134010.1002/adma.200401340 ↗
13. [13] Lu, Y.; Bangsaruntip, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Nishi, Y.; Dai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3518−3519; https://doi.org/10.1021/ja058836v10.1021/ja058836v ↗
14. [14] Cionca, N, Müller, N, Mombelli, A. Two-piece-zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns. A prospective clinical study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 26, 2015, 413- 418, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.1237010.1111/clr.12370 ↗