Low-cost potassium hydroxide texturing of monocrystalline silicon: a response surface methodology approach for solar cell application
Source abstract
Abstract
Improved light trapping and minimal surface reflectance are needed for higher conversion efficiency of the solar cell. Proposed research work has been focused on reducing the light reflection from the substrate. The fabrication of pyramidal structures on the surface of monocrystalline Si (100) wafers is an effective approach for reducing front-surface reflection losses in traditional silicon solar cells. Alkaline solutions are often used for texturing monocrystalline silicon. Tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) and potassium hydroxide (KOH) are the predominant etchants utilized in the wet anisotropic etching procedure. One of the two etchants, KOH is an economical option that offers significant etch rate anisotropy between Si (100) and Si (111) planes. Enhancing the etch rate is a significant research challenge for both industrial and academic purposes. This research examines the influence of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in 1wt% KOH on the etching properties of Si (100). A systematic parametric analysis was performed by adding several concentrations of PVA (0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%) to a 1 wt% KOH solution. Texturing was conducted at 100 °C for 20, 30, and 40 mins. The response surface methodology (RSM) suggests solution concentrations as process factors. Without using an antireflection (ARC) layer, an efficient surface texture with average reflectance of 9.05 % was obtained. The antireflection behavior was additionally correlated to the silicon etch rate. RSM indicated optimal values for PVA concentration and time of 0.1% and 30 mins, respectively. Optimizing the strategy and parameters for texturizing high-efficiency silicon solar cells by response surface methodology may prove beneficial. Reflectance was calculated by the diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer (DRS). The surface morphology of Si (100) wafers was examined using scanning electron microscopy
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] Iencinella, D., et al., An optimized texturing process for silicon solar cell substrates using TMAH. 2005. 87(1-4): p. 725-732; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.02010.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.020 ↗
2. [2] Ali, K., et al., Low-cost anisotropic etching of monocrystalline Si (1 0 0): Optimization using response surface methodology. 2012. 52(4): p. 782-792; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2012.06.00810.1016/j.spmi.2012.06.008 ↗
3. [3] Kwon, S., et al., Effects of textured morphology on the short circuit current of single crystalline silicon solar cells: evaluation of alkaline wet-texture processes. 2009. 9(6): p. 1310- 1314; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2008.12.01410.1016/j.cap.2008.12.014 ↗
4. [4] Lv, H., et al., Porous-pyramids structured silicon surface with low reflectance over a broad band by electrochemical etching. 2012. 258(14): p. 5451-5454; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.03310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.033 ↗
5. [5] Basu, P.K., A. Khanna, and Z.J.R.e. Hameiri, The effect of front pyramid heights on the efficiency of homogeneously textured inline-diffused screen-printed monocrystalline silicon wafer solar cells. 2015. 78: p. 590-598; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.05810.1016/j.renene.2015.01.058 ↗
6. [6] Rola, K.P., I.J.M.t. Zubel, Impact of alcohol additives concentration on etch rate and surface morphology of (100) and (110) Si substrates etched in KOH solutions. 2013. 19: p. 635-643; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-012-1675-x10.1007/s00542-012-1675-x ↗
7. [7] Rao, A.V.N., et al., Effect of NH2OH on etching characteristics of Si {100} in KOH solution. 2017. 6(9): p. P609; https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0161709jss10.1149/2.0161709jss ↗
8. [8] Dutta, S., et al., Fabrication of comb structure with vertical sidewalls in Si (110) substrate by wet etching in boiling KOH solution. 2019. 25: p. 3091-3096; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4195-510.1007/s00542-018-4195-5 ↗
9. [9] Gupta, A., P. Pal, and C.S. Sharma. A facile way of surface texturing of Si {100} using KOH for silicon solar cells. in 2021 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration & Packaging of MEMS and MOEMS (DTIP). 2021. IEEE; https://doi.org/10.1109/DTIP54218.2021.956868410.1109/DTIP54218.2021.9568684 ↗
10. [10] Papet, P., et al., Pyramidal texturing of silicon solar cell with TMAH chemical anisotropic etching. 2006. 90(15): p. 2319-2328; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.03.005 61710.1016/j.solmat.2006.03.005 ↗
11. [11] Gupta, A., et al., Surface texturing of Silicon {100} in an extremely low concentration TMAH for minimized reflectivity. 2019. 8(10): p. P622; https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0301910jss10.1149/2.0301910jss ↗
12. [12] Ashok, A., P.J.M.T. Pal, Silicon micromachining in 25 wt% TMAH without and with surfactant concentrations ranging from ppb to ppm. 2017. 23: p. 47-54; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-015-2699-910.1007/s00542-015-2699-9 ↗
13. [13] Wang, L., et al., Improving efficiency of silicon heterojunction solar cells by surface texturing of silicon wafers using tetramethylammonium hydroxide. 2014. 268: p. 619-624; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.08810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.088 ↗
14. [14] Silva, A., et al., The surface texturing of monocrystalline silicon with NH4OH and ion implantation for applications in solar cells compatible with CMOS technology. 2014. 44: p. 132- 137; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.12.01910.1016/j.egypro.2013.12.019 ↗
15. [15] Sridharan, S., N. Bhat, K.J.A.P.L. Bhat, Silicon surface texturing with a combination of potassium hydroxide and tetra-methyl ammonium hydroxide etching. 2013. 102(2); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.477673310.1063/1.4776733 ↗
16. [16] Alvarez, H.S., et al., NH 4 OH-B silicon texturing of periodic V-groove channels, upright, and inverted pyramids structures. 2021. 11(3): p. 570-574; https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.305942110.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3059421 ↗
17. [17] Bhat, K.N., et al. Optimization of EDP solutions for feature-size-independent silicon etching. in Micromachining and Microfabrication Process Technology VII. 2001. SPIE; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.44297810.1117/12.442978 ↗
18. [18] Yellampalli, C., et al. Micromachining and Microfabrication Process Technology VIII. 2003. SPIE; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.47825710.1117/12.478257 ↗
19. [19] Dutta, S., et al., Comparison of etch characteristics of KOH, TMAH and EDP for bulk micromachining of silicon (110). 2011. 17: p. 1621-1628; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-011-1351-610.1007/s00542-011-1351-6 ↗
20. [20] Bándy, E., M. Rencz, in 2014 14th Biennial Baltic Electronic Conference (BEC). 2014. IEEE; https://doi.org/10.1109/BEC.2014.732054810.1109/BEC.2014.7320548 ↗
21. [21] Ju, C., P.J.J.S. Hesketh, A.A. Physical, Measurements of the anisotropic etching of a singlecrystal silicon sphere in aqueous cesium hydroxide. 1992. 33(3): p. 191-196; https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(92)80166-Z10.1016/0924-4247(92)80166-Z ↗
22. [22] Hasan, M.M., F. Rahman, International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. 2024. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2024-13169110.1115/MSEC2024-131691 ↗
23. [23] Declercq, M.J., L. Gerzberg, J.D.J.J.o.T.E.S. Meindl, Optimization of the Hydrazine‐Water Solution for Anisotropic Etching of Silicon in Integrated Circuit Technology. 1975. 122(4): p. 545; https://doi.org/10.1149/1.213425710.1149/1.2134257 ↗
24. [24] Shikida, M., et al., Differences in anisotropic etching properties of KOH and TMAH solutions. 2000. 80(2): p. 179-188; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00264-210.1016/S0924-4247(99)00264-2 ↗
25. [25] Sai, H., H. Jia, M.J.J.o.A.P. Kondo, Impact of front and rear texture of thin-film microcrystalline silicon solar cells on their light trapping properties. 2010. 108(4); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.346796810.1063/1.3467968 ↗
26. [26] Hajjiah, A.T., S.K. Zachariah, M.Y.J.J.o.E.R. Ghannam, Study of surface morphology and optical characterization of crystalline and multi-crystalline silicon surface textured in highly diluted alkaline solutions. 2014. 2: p. 1-16; https://doi.org/10.7603/s40632-014-0009-910.7603/s40632-014-0009-9 ↗
27. [27] Dziuban, J.A., R.J.S.m. Walczak, Etching microwave silicon
28. [EMSi]-microwave enhanced fast deep anisotropic etching of silicon for micro-electromechanical systems
29. [MEMS]. 2001. 13(1): p. 41-55.
30. [28] Dziuban, J.A.J.S., A.A. Physical, Microwave enhanced fast anisotropic etching of monocrystalline silicon, 2000. 85(1-3): p. 133-138; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924- 4247(00)00373-3 61810.1016/S0924-4247(00)00373-3 ↗
31. [29] Chen, J., et al., Study of anisotropic etching of (1 0 0) Si with ultrasonic agitation. 2002. 96(2-3): p. 152-156; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00786-510.1016/S0924-4247(01)00786-5 ↗
32. [30] Aoyama, T., et al., Fabrication of single-crystalline silicon solar cells using wafers sliced by a diamond wire saw. Proc. 25th Europ. PVSEC, 2009. 2429.
33. [31] Hashmi, G., et al., Texturization of as-cut p-type monocrystalline silicon wafer using different wet chemical solutions. 2018. 124: p. 1-11; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-1818-810.1007/s00339-018-1818-8 ↗
34. [32] Chang, T.-H., et al., Efficiency enhancement in GaAs solar cells using self-assembled microspheres. Optics express, 2009. 17(8): p. 6519-6524; https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.00651910.1364/OE.17.006519 ↗
35. [33] Ximello Quiebras, J.N., Wet chemical textures for crystalline silicon solar cells. 2013.
36. [34] Bezerra, M.A., et al., Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta, 2008. 76(5): p. 965-977; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.01910.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019 ↗
37. [35] Hanrahan, G. K. Lu, Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 2006. 36(3-4): p. 141-151; https://doi.org/10.1080/1040834060096947810.1080/10408340600969478 ↗
38. [36] Dc, M., Design and analysis of experiments. 2001, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
39. [37] Myers, R., R.S. Methodology, Allyn and Bacon. Response Surface Methodology, New York, 1971.
40. [38] Sahu, J.N., B.C. Meikap, A.V. Patwardhan, CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water, 2010. 38(5‐6): p. 533- 542; https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20100002810.1002/clen.201000028 ↗
41. [39] Gunaraj, V., N. Murugan, Journal of materials processing technology, 1999. 88(1-3): p. 266- 275; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00405-110.1016/S0924-0136(98)00405-1 ↗
42. [40] Sahu, J., J. Acharya, B. Meikap, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009. 172(2-3): p. 818- 825; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.07510.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.075 ↗
43. [41] Box, G.E., J.S. Hunter, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957: p. 195-241; https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/117770704710.1214/aoms/1177707047 ↗
44. [42] Box, G.E., J.S. Hunter, Technometrics, 1961. 3(3): p. 311-351; https://doi.org/10.2307/126672510.2307/1266725 ↗
45. [43] Bhattacharya, S., 2021, IntechOpen; https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.9583510.5772/intechopen.95835 ↗
46. [44] Arunkumar, N., et al., The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012. 63: p. 1065-1072; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3970-110.1007/s00170-012-3970-1 ↗