journal article·2000-02-01

Hydroxylamine Seeding of Colloidal Au Nanoparticles. 3. Controlled Formation of Conductive Au Films

Kenneth R. Brown, L. Andrew Lyon, Audrey P. Fox, Brian D. Reiss, Michael J. Natan

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 12· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

An approach to enlarge preformed colloidal Au nanoparticles in solution based on the Au colloidal surface-catalyzed reduction of Au 3+ by NH 2 OH (“seeding”) has been adapted to 12-nm-diameter colloidal Au nanoparticles immobilized in monolayers and multilayers. Bulk characterization of the ensuing films was carried out by atomic absorption, UV−vis−near-IR optical spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and dc resistance measurements. Exposure of a 12-nm-diameter Au colloid monolayer on organosilane-modified glass surfaces to NH 2 OH/Au 3+ leads to rapid particle growth and coalescence: after roughly 5−10 min, the optical and electrical properties closely resemble that of conductive Au thin films prepared by evaporation. Evolution of the nanometer-scale architecture was followed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), leading to the following key findings: (i) Seeding of surface-confined colloidal Au leads to a very different distribution in particle size/shape than seeding with identical particles in solution. (ii) Au 3+ /NH 2 OH-mediated growth of surface-confined colloidal Au is highly dependent on particle coverage, with different particle densities in monolayers leading to distinct film architectures that are easily detected by FE-SEM and SPR.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, 152 Davey Laboratory, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-6300

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Mallory G. O. · 1990
2. Sullivan A. M. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1995 · 142 · 225510.1149/1.2044282 ↗
3. Romankiw L. T. · 1987
4. Dressick W. J. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1994 · 141 · 22010.1149/1.2054686 ↗
5. Calvert J. M. · 1994
6. Eliadis E. D. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · 10510.1149/1.1837370 ↗
7. Lin W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 5987
8. Lin W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 5996
9. Moberg P. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · L15310.1149/1.1837707 ↗
10. Hidber P. C. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 1380
11. Bradley J. C. · Adv. Mater. · 1997 · 9 · 117110.1002/adma.19970091509 ↗
12. Brown K. R. · J. Chem. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 313
13. Stremsdoerfer G. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1988 · 135 · 288510.1149/1.2095453 ↗
14. Hayat M. A. · 1989
15. Frens G. · Nature · 1972 · 241 · 22
16. Frens G. · Kolloid-Z. u. Z. Polymere · 1972 · 250 · 74110.1007/BF01498565 ↗
17. Goodman S. L. · J. Microsc. · 1981 · 123 · 213
18. Freeman R. G. · J. Science · 1995 · 267 · 1632
19. Grabar K. C. · J. Anal. Chem. · 1995 · 67 · 74310.1021/ac00100a008 ↗
20. Doron A. · Langmuir · 1995 · 11 · 131710.1021/la00004a044 ↗
21. Giersig M. · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 341310.1021/la00036a014 ↗
22. Musick M. D. · J. Chem. Mater. · 1997 · 9 · 150110.1021/cm970087w ↗
23. Brust M. · J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. · 1994 · 801 · 802
24. Terrill R. H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 1254810.1021/ja00155a017 ↗
25. Hostetler M. J. · Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1997 · 2 · 5010.1016/S1359-0294(97)80007-6 ↗
26. (a) Brandt, E. S.; Cotton, T. M. InInvestigations of Surfaces andInterfaces, Part B, 2nd ed.; Rossiter, B. W., Baetzold, R. C., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: NewYork, 1993; Vol. IXB, Chapter 8, pp 663−718.
27. Creighton J. · 1990 · 26
28. Cotton T. M. · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 1991 · 20 · 42
29. Garrell R. L. · Anal. Chem. · 1989 · 61 · 411A10.1021/ac00181a001 ↗
30. Zeman E. J. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 64310.1021/j100287a028 ↗
31. Grabar K. C. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 115210.1021/ja952233+ ↗
32. Clerc J. P. · Adv. Phys. · 1990 · 39 · 30910.1080/00018739000101501 ↗
33. Brouers F. · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 67310.1103/PhysRevB.47.666 ↗
34. (b) Stefanou, N.; Modinos, A.J. Phys. Condens. Matter1991,3, 8149−8157.10.1088/0953-8984/3/41/013 ↗
35. Yagil Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 2511
36. Abeles B. · Adv. Phys. · 1975 · 24 · 46110.1080/00018737500101431 ↗
37. Sheng P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1978 · 40 · 120010.1103/PhysRevLett.40.1197 ↗
38. Grannan D. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1981 · 46 · 37810.1103/PhysRevLett.46.375 ↗
39. Hundley M. F. · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 1029610.1103/PhysRevB.38.10290 ↗
40. (a) Raether, H.Surface Plasmons; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988.10.1007/BFb0048323 ↗
41. Sambles J. R. · Contemporary Phys. · 1991 · 32 · 18310.1080/00107519108211048 ↗
42. Barbas S. M. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1995 · 92 · 253310.1073/pnas.92.7.2529 ↗
43. Ladbury J. E. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1995 · 92 · 320310.1073/pnas.92.8.3199 ↗
44. Plant A. L. · J. Anal. Biochem. · 1995 · 226 · 34810.1006/abio.1995.1234 ↗
45. Salamon Z. · Biophys. J. · 1996 · 71 · 857
46. Ward L. D. · J. Biochemistry · 1995 · 34 · 2907
47. Xu J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1995 · 92 · 2090
48. Frey B. L. · Anal. Chem. · 1995 · 67 · 4457
49. Yeung D. · J. Trends Anal. Chem. · 1995 · 14 · 56
50. Gordon E. M. · J. Med. Chem. · 1994 · 37 · 140110.1021/jm00036a001 ↗
51. Grabar K. C. · J. Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 236110.1021/la950561h ↗
52. Grabar K. C. · J. Anal. Chem. · 1997 · 69 · 47710.1021/ac9605962 ↗
53. Smilauer P. · Contemporary Phys. · 1991 · 32 · 10210.1080/00107519108213805 ↗
54. Resistivity (ρ) is calculated using the formula ρ =RAL-1, whereRis the measured resistance in ohms,Ais cross-sectional area, andLis the length over whichRis measured. From data in Figures 4 and 5 and the Supporting Information, the upper limit to film thickness (for samples with low coverage of colloidal Au) is 50−60 nm; the average thickness is actually lower. Thus,A= 0.9×(60 × 10-7) = 5.4 × 10-6cm2. Using the lowest value forRfor the low-coverage colloidal Au film (4 Ω) andL= 2.1 cm from Table 1, ρseed film= 1.0 × 10-5Ω cm. Note that unambiguous, quantitative measurements of the quantity of Au in a film can be made by digestion of the surface and subsequent analysis of Au using atomic absorption. These measurements gave a film thickness of 70 nm for the thickest film.28
55. The deposition rate for Au0was linear over time (Supporting Information). Samples treated with 0.01% HAuCl4/0.4 mM NH2OH for 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 30 min were found to contain 300, 548, 913, 1185, 1241, 1612, 1684, and 3628 ppb, respectively. By using the 6-mm O-ring, 0.283 cm2of surface film was removed. If the film was 35 nm thick this would produce a (cylindrical) volume of 0.991 × 10-6cm3. From the density of Au (19.3 g/cm3), 19.1 μg of Au would be dissoved. When taken up in 10 mL, the solution concentration is 1.9 ppm. Since the 30-min sample was found to contain 3.6 ppm, it means that the equivalent of a 66-nm-thick Au film had been removed.
56. Weast R. C. · 1988
57. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980; pp 213−248.
58. Adkins C. · 1995 · 210
59. Blacher S. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1993 · 74 · 21310.1063/1.355283 ↗
60. Fukumi K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 75 · 308010.1063/1.356156 ↗
61. Hache F. · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1986 · 3 · 165510.1364/JOSAB.3.001647 ↗
62. Baker B. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 872210.1021/ja961327w ↗
63. McMahon J. J. · Spectrochim. Acta · 1982 · 38 · 112210.1016/0584-8539(82)80152-9 ↗
64. Semin D. J. · Anal. Chem. · 1994 · 66 · 433110.1021/ac00095a032 ↗
65. Maya J. L. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 1997 · 15 · 242