journal article·2025-04-22

Structure–Activity Relationships in Ether-Functionalized Solid-State Metal–Organic Framework Electrolytes

Anthony U. Mu, Vibhu Vardhan Singh, Hyunyong Kim, Dong Ju Lee, Namseo Kim, Christian X. Ruff, Aaron Levy, Thomas A. Young, Francesco Paesani, Seth M. Cohen, Tod A. Pascal, Zheng Chen

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 37· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The structure–property relationships of metal–organic framework (MOF)-based solid-state electrolytes are not well understood. Herein, a systematic investigation of 12 Zr(IV)-based UiO-66 MOFs with varying ether-chain functional groups was carried out to elucidate the critical microscopic interactions that facilitate improved solid-state electrolyte performance. Enhanced sampling molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed and revealed a three-tier ion hopping mechanism: linker–linker hopping, linker-counterion hopping, and counterion-counterion hopping. Detailed structural analysis of the MD trajectories revealed that the chemistry and morphology of the linker groups affect the relative stability and population distribution of the electrolyte components, such that crown-ether-based linker groups enhance the probability of extended, low-barrier ion percolation pathways. As a result, we were able to tune the ionic conductivities by rationally manipulating the counterion distributions, linker binding strengths, and the configurational entropy (multivariability of the linkers). The resulting performance of these MOF-based solid-state electrolytes was significantly enhanced, with a methoxy-functionalized framework ( UiO-66-L1 100 ) achieving high ionic conductivities of 2.32 × 10 –4 S/cm and 2.07 × 10 –3 S/cm at 30 °C and 90 °C, respectively, an order of magnitude greater than other all-solid-state MOF electrolyte systems. The electrolyte stability was evaluated with LiIn|LPSCl|MOF:LiTFSI|LPSCl|LiIn symmetric cells, showing excellent Li plating/stripping processes for over 2 months.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aiiso Yufeng Li Family Department of Chemical and Nano Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, United States

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0358, United States

Program in Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, United States

Sustainable Power and Energy Center

University of California, San Diego

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Division of Materials Research

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr200205j10.1021/cr200205j ↗
2. 10.1021/cr200217c10.1021/cr200217c ↗
3. 10.1021/cr200274s10.1021/cr200274s ↗
4. 10.1021/cr200327210.1021/cr2003272 ↗
5. 10.1039/C9TA04680A10.1039/C9TA04680A ↗
6. 10.1021/cr300014x10.1021/cr300014x ↗
7. 10.1039/D0DT04384B10.1039/D0DT04384B ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0248510.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02485 ↗
9. 10.1002/advs.20230528010.1002/advs.202305280 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-021-23603-010.1038/s41467-021-23603-0 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0182510.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01825 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja205827z10.1021/ja205827z ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0345810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03458 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20170747610.1002/adma.201707476 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.8b1341810.1021/jacs.8b13418 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0074410.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00744 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.9b1041810.1021/jacs.9b10418 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.7b0619710.1021/jacs.7b06197 ↗
19. 10.1039/D2CE00663D10.1039/D2CE00663D ↗
20. 10.1039/D4DT02756F10.1039/D4DT02756F ↗
21. 10.3390/nano1207107610.3390/nano12071076 ↗
22. 10.1002/smtd.20210050810.1002/smtd.202100508 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.2c0371010.1021/jacs.2c03710 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0465410.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04654 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0041010.1021/acsaem.0c00410 ↗
26. 10.1002/chem.20130032610.1002/chem.201300326 ↗
27. 10.1039/C5TA03471J10.1039/C5TA03471J ↗
28. 10.1039/D2CC01286C10.1039/D2CC01286C ↗
29. 10.1039/D0CC03147J10.1039/D0CC03147J ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0195510.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01955 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15503010.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155030 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0302710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03027 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0517310.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05173 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20230177210.1002/anie.202301772 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.075 ↗
36. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac834c10.1149/1945-7111/ac834c ↗
37. 10.1039/C9TA12889A10.1039/C9TA12889A ↗
38. Liotta C. L. · 2001
39. 10.1021/jp960519a10.1021/jp960519a ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jssc.2024.12464310.1016/j.jssc.2024.124643 ↗
41. 10.1021/jp506422p10.1021/jp506422p ↗
42. 10.1039/D3TC01313H10.1039/D3TC01313H ↗
43. 10.1063/5.018956910.1063/5.0189569 ↗
44. 10.1039/D2EE03626F10.1039/D2EE03626F ↗
45. 10.1039/D2SC06620C10.1039/D2SC06620C ↗
46. 10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.02060310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jssc.2024.12469810.1016/j.jssc.2024.124698 ↗
49. 10.1002/jcc.2003510.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja962176010.1021/ja9621760 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
52. Tuckerman M. E. · 2010
53. Hockney R. W. · 202110.1201/9780367806934 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.01810.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.01110.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
57. 10.1021/ct200866d10.1021/ct200866d ↗
58. 10.1039/C4CP04286G10.1039/C4CP04286G ↗