Cluster-Based Machine Learning Potentials to Describe Disordered Metal–Organic Frameworks up to the Mesoscale
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly interesting and tunable materials. By incorporating spatial defects into their atomic structure, MOFs can be finetuned to exhibit precise chemical functionalities, extending their applicability in various technological fields. Defect engineering requires a fundamental understanding of the nature of spatial disorder and consequent changes in material properties, which is currently lacking. We introduce the cluster-based learning methodology, enabling the development of state-of-the-art machine learning potentials (MLPs) from defective systems at any length scale. Our method identifies atomic interactions in bulk structures and extracts local environments as finite molecular fragments to augment the model’s training data where needed. We show that cluster-based learning delivers MLPs capable of accurately describing spatial defects in mesoscopic systems with over 20 thousand atoms. Afterward, we select our best model to investigate some major mechanical properties of spatially disordered UiO-66-derived structures, elucidating the influence of defect concentration and composition on material behavior. Our analysis includes large supercell structures, demonstrating that (near-) ab initio accuracy is within reach at the mesoscale.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Molecular Modeling, Ghent University, Technologiepark 46, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
Funding
Universiteit Gent · Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.trac.2014.02.01210.1016/j.trac.2014.02.012 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20170412410.1002/adma.201704124 ↗
3. 10.1039/C7CS00033B10.1039/C7CS00033B ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20241200510.1002/adma.202412005 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature0165010.1038/nature01650 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
7. 10.1038/nchem.269110.1038/nchem.2691 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170450110.1002/adma.201704501 ↗
9. 10.1039/C5DT04392A10.1039/C5DT04392A ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-024-47426-x10.1038/s41467-024-47426-x ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0318810.1021/acs.iecr.9b03188 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0TA08009H10.1039/D0TA08009H ↗
13. 10.1063/1.496619210.1063/1.4966192 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.512633610.1063/1.5126336 ↗
15. 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00156-110.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00156-1 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41563-020-0777-610.1038/s41563-020-0777-6 ↗
17. 10.1063/5.013961110.1063/5.0139611 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.09410210.1103/PhysRevB.108.094102 ↗
19. Jia, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, M.; Lu, D.; Lin, L.; Car, R.; Weinan, E.; Zhang, L. In Pushing the Limit of Molecular Dynamics with Ab Initio Accuracy to 100 Million Atoms with Machine Learning, SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis; IEEE, 2020; pp 1–14.10.1109/SC41405.2020.00009 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41524-023-01092-710.1038/s41524-023-01092-7 ↗
21. Kosanovich, K.; Gurumoorthy, A.; Sinzinger, E.; Piovoso, M. In Improving the Extrapolation Capability of Neural Networks, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control; IEEE, 1996; pp 390–395.10.1109/ISIC.1996.556233 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11698010.1016/j.actamat.2021.116980 ↗
23. Mahmoud, C. B.; El-Machachi, Z.; Gierczak, K. A.; Gardner, J. L. A.; Deringer, V. L. Assessing zero-shot generalisation behaviour in graph-neural-network interatomic potentials, arXiv:2502.21317. arXiv.org e-Print archive, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.21317. (accessed March 31, 2025).
24. 10.1073/pnas.050543610210.1073/pnas.0505436102 ↗
25. 10.1063/5.000479210.1063/5.0004792 ↗
26. 10.1063/5.000444510.1063/5.0004445 ↗
27. Settles, B. Active Learning Literature Survey; Technical Report: 2009, p 1648.
28. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0106110.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01061 ↗
29. 10.1039/D1SC01825F10.1039/D1SC01825F ↗
30. 10.1038/s41524-024-01427-y10.1038/s41524-024-01427-y ↗
31. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.12.00910.1016/j.chempr.2020.12.009 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41524-023-00969-x10.1038/s41524-023-00969-x ↗
33. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11076510.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110765 ↗
34. 10.1039/D0FD00066C10.1039/D0FD00066C ↗
35. 10.1093/nsr/nwz17010.1093/nsr/nwz170 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c0677810.1021/acs.jpca.2c06778 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0002110.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021 ↗
38. Domina, M.; Sanvito, S. A general formalism for machine-learning models based on multipolar-spherical harmonics, arXiv:2503.09618. arXiv.org e-Print archive. 2025 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09618. (accessed May 28, 2025).10.1103/g49f-b1x5 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.02380410.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.023804 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.502380210.1063/1.5023802 ↗
41. 10.1063/5.000216210.1063/5.0002162 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41524-020-0283-z10.1038/s41524-020-0283-z ↗
43. O’Neill, J.; Delany, S. J.; MacNamee, B. Advances in Computational Intelligence Systems; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017; Vol. 513, pp 375–386.10.1007/978-3-319-46562-3_24 ↗
44. 10.1039/D2DD00034B10.1039/D2DD00034B ↗
45. Tan, A. R.; Dietschreit, J. C. B.; Gomez-Bombarelli, R. Enhanced sampling of robust molecular datasets with uncertainty-based collective variables, arXiv:2402.03753. arXiv.org e-Print archive, 2024 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03753. (accessed May 8, 2024).
46. 10.1063/5.013657410.1063/5.0136574 ↗
47. Moitra, A. Algorithmic Aspects of Machine Learning; Cambridge University Press, 2018; pp 107–131.10.1017/9781316882177 ↗
48. 10.1109/MSP.2004.131113810.1109/MSP.2004.1311138 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41592-018-0019-x10.1038/s41592-018-0019-x ↗
50. 10.1098/rsta.2015.020210.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.03510910.1103/PhysRevB.71.035109 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.219022010.1063/1.2190220 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-510.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
55. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100565910.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 ↗
56. Verstraelen, T.; Vanduyfhuys, L.; Vandenbrande, S.; Rogge, S. Yaff, yet another force field. 2013.
57. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
58. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0680910.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06809 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRev.71.80910.1103/PhysRev.71.809 ↗
60. 10.1029/JB092iB09p0931910.1029/JB092iB09p09319 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b0074810.1021/acs.jctc.5b00748 ↗
62. 10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
63. 10.1039/D1CE00210D10.1039/D1CE00210D ↗
64. 10.3389/fchem.2021.67373810.3389/fchem.2021.673738 ↗
65. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0004210.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00042 ↗
66. 10.1038/ncomms517610.1038/ncomms5176 ↗
67. 10.1039/C4CE01672F10.1039/C4CE01672F ↗
68. 10.1038/s42256-023-00740-310.1038/s42256-023-00740-3 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0195610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01956 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41557-019-0263-410.1038/s41557-019-0263-4 ↗
71. 10.1021/jz400234510.1021/jz4002345 ↗
72. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0192210.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01922 ↗
73. 10.1021/jacs.8b1300910.1021/jacs.8b13009 ↗
74. 10.1080/10408436.2013.77250310.1080/10408436.2013.772503 ↗
75. 10.1021/jacs.8b0709810.1021/jacs.8b07098 ↗
76. 10.1039/C5DT04330A10.1039/C5DT04330A ↗
77. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c0025010.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00250 ↗
78. 10.1002/jcc.2517310.1002/jcc.25173 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11013510.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110135 ↗
80. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0022610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00226 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.427910.1103/PhysRevB.36.4279 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.03.00210.1016/j.matt.2019.03.002 ↗
83. 10.1063/5.000649810.1063/5.0006498 ↗