journal article·2024-11-26Open access

Atomistic Interpretation of the Oxygen K-Edge X-ray Absorption Spectra of Layered Li-Ion Battery Cathode Materials

Namrata Ramesh, Hrishit Banerjee, Jack E. N. Swallow, Erik Björklund, Ava Dean, Pravin Didwal, Michael Fraser, Conor M. E. Phelan, Lijin An, Jasper Singh, Jarrod Lewis, Weixin Song, Robert A. House, Andrew J. Morris, Robert S. Weatherup, Rebecca J. Nicholls

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 22

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Core loss spectroscopies can provide powerful element-specific insight into the redox processes occurring in Li-ion battery cathodes, but this requires an accurate interpretation of the spectral features. Here, we systematically interpret oxygen K-edge core loss spectra of layered lithium transition-metal (TM) oxides (LiMO 2, where M = Co, Ni, Mn) from first principles using density-functional theory (DFT). Spectra are simulated using three exchange–correlation functionals, comprising the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional PBE, the DFT–PBE + Hubbard U method, and the meta -GGA functional rSCAN. In general, rSCAN provides a better match to experimentally observed excitation energies of spectral features compared to both PBE and PBE + U, especially at energies close to the main edge. Projected density of states of core-hole calculations show that the O orbitals are better described by rSCAN. Hybridization, structural distortions, chemical composition, and magnetism significantly influence the spectra. The O K-edge spectrum of LiNiO 2 obtained using rSCAN shows a closer match to the experimental X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) when derived from a simulation cell which includes a Jahn–Teller distortion, showing that the DFT-calculated pre-edge feature contains information about not only chemical species but also geometric distortion. Core loss spectra derived from DFT can also differentiate between materials with the same structure and magnetic configuration but comprising different TMs; these differences are comparable to those observed in experimental XAS from the same materials. This foundational work helps establish the extent to which DFT can be used to bridge the interpretation gap between experimental spectroscopic signatures and ab initio methods describing complex battery materials, such as lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxides.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.

Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.

School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Scotland DD1 4HN, U.K.

The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.

Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.

School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SE, U.K.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · UK Research and Innovation · Royal Academy of Engineering · H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Faraday Institution · H2020 European Research Council · Rhodes Scholarships

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
2. 10.1002/ese3.9510.1002/ese3.95 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-020-15355-010.1038/s41467-020-15355-0 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-062011-08102410.1146/annurev-chembioeng-062011-081024 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20190098510.1002/adma.201900985 ↗
6. Kleiner K. · arXiv · 2020 · arXiv:2006.0996
7. 10.1038/s41467-017-02291-910.1038/s41467-017-02291-9 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20200322710.1002/aenm.202003227 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0030410.1021/acsnano.1c00304 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-018-0097-010.1038/s41560-018-0097-0 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586-019-1854-310.1038/s41586-019-1854-3 ↗
12. 10.1039/D4EE02398F10.1039/D4EE02398F ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0272210.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02722 ↗
14. 10.1039/C8CP03390K10.1039/C8CP03390K ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-021-00780-210.1038/s41560-021-00780-2 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41560-020-00697-210.1038/s41560-020-00697-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.018 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9MH00765B10.1039/C9MH00765B ↗
19. 10.3390/condmat401000510.3390/condmat4010005 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0017110.1021/acs.accounts.0c00171 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0043910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00439 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0159710.1021/acs.jpcc.2c01597 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.11511810.1103/PhysRevB.92.115118 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.11511510.1103/PhysRevB.81.115115 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.01710.1016/j.joule.2023.06.017 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0092810.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00928 ↗
27. 10.1038/381499a010.1038/381499a0 ↗
28. 10.1107/S160057752400134610.1107/S1600577524001346 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.297910.1103/PhysRevB.33.2979 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
33. 10.1021/ct300868x10.1021/ct300868x ↗
34. 10.1063/1.509464610.1063/1.5094646 ↗
35. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.210.1038/npjcompumats.2016.2 ↗
36. 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.6507510.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.04514610.1103/PhysRevB.102.045146 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.04510610.1103/PhysRevB.99.045106 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.16512410.1103/PhysRevB.108.165124 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.01310.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.013 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.micron.2006.03.01010.1016/j.micron.2006.03.010 ↗
42. 10.1006/adnd.2000.084810.1006/adnd.2000.0848 ↗
43. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/10/10420410.1088/0953-8984/21/10/104204 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cpc.2017.12.00810.1016/j.cpc.2017.12.008 ↗
45. 10.1107/S002188980801201610.1107/S0021889808012016 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0272210.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02722 ↗
47. 10.1149/2.0951410jes10.1149/2.0951410jes ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.323610.1103/PhysRevB.46.3236 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0254610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02546 ↗
50. Hertz J. T. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2007 · 12 · 075119
51. 10.1038/s41524-018-0117-410.1038/s41524-018-0117-4 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00706-810.1016/S0167-2738(01)00706-8 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.05.02410.1016/j.jssc.2011.05.024 ↗
54. 10.1149/1.183841110.1149/1.1838411 ↗
55. 10.1006/jssc.1996.718910.1006/jssc.1996.7189 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.323610.1103/PhysRevB.46.3236 ↗
57. 10.1016/0038-1098(95)00020-810.1016/0038-1098(95)00020-8 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.06441010.1103/PhysRevB.71.064410 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0344210.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03442 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0406610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04066 ↗
61. 10.1016/0038-1098(95)00279-010.1016/0038-1098(95)00279-0 ↗
62. 10.1021/cm702981a10.1021/cm702981a ↗
63. 10.1016/0038-1098(95)00020-810.1016/0038-1098(95)00020-8 ↗
64. 10.48550/arXiv.2211.0904710.48550/arXiv.2211.09047 ↗
65. 10.1088/2515-7655/ad798010.1088/2515-7655/ad7980 ↗
66. 10.1002/anie.20181247210.1002/anie.201812472 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00992-410.1016/S0167-2738(01)00992-4 ↗
68. 10.1007/s11581-020-03751-x10.1007/s11581-020-03751-x ↗
69. 10.1002/anie.20181247210.1002/anie.201812472 ↗
70. 10.1007/s40843-021-1946-910.1007/s40843-021-1946-9 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.24514310.1103/PhysRevB.103.245143 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.09640210.1103/PhysRevLett.118.096402 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0043910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00439 ↗
74. 10.1038/s41560-023-01289-610.1038/s41560-023-01289-6 ↗
75. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0204910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02049 ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0323810.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03238 ↗