journal article·2024-10-08Open access

Na Vacancy-Driven Phase Transformation and Fast Ion Conduction in W-Doped Na3SbS4 from Machine Learning Force Fields

Johan Klarbring, Aron Walsh

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 19

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Solid-state sodium batteries require effective electrolytes that conduct at room temperature. The Na 3 PnCh 4 (Pn = P, Sb; Ch = S, Se) family has been studied for their high Na ion conductivity. The population of Na vacancies, which mediate ion diffusion in these materials, can be enhanced through aliovalent doping on the pnictogen site. To probe the microscopic role of extrinsic doping and its impact on diffusion and phase stability, we trained a machine learning force field for Na 3– x W x Sb 1– x S 4 based on an equivariant graph neural network. Analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics trajectories shows that an increased Na vacancy population stabilizes the global cubic phase at lower temperatures with enhanced Na ion diffusion and that the explicit role of the substitutional W dopants is limited. In the global cubic phase, we observe large and long-lived deviations of atoms from the averaged symmetry, echoing recent experimental suggestions. Evidence of correlated Na ion diffusion is also presented that underpins the suggested superionic nature of these materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · 2D Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Vetenskapsr?det

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.054 ↗
2. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-019-0165-510.1038/s41578-019-0165-5 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20170301210.1002/aenm.201703012 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0TA10994K10.1039/D0TA10994K ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms184310.1038/ncomms1843 ↗
7. 10.1002/advs.20160008910.1002/advs.201600089 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0045810.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00458 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.2c1180310.1021/jacs.2c11803 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-019-13178-210.1038/s41467-019-13178-2 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0253710.1021/acsenergylett.9b02537 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.17310.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.173 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.01710.1016/j.joule.2023.03.017 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20230356510.1002/smll.202303565 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.18430710.1103/PhysRevB.64.184307 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-022-32190-710.1038/s41467-022-32190-7 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0447610.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04476 ↗
18. 10.1038/s43588-023-00561-910.1038/s43588-023-00561-9 ↗
19. 10.1063/5.004184910.1063/5.0041849 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.10046310.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100463 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0272610.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02726 ↗
22. 10.1088/2515-7655/acbbef10.1088/2515-7655/acbbef ↗
23. 10.1038/s41524-023-01049-w10.1038/s41524-023-01049-w ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-023-36329-y10.1038/s41467-023-36329-y ↗
25. Kozinsky, B.; Musaelian, A.; Johansson, A.; Batzner, S. Scaling the Leading Accuracy of Deep Equivariant Models to Biomolecular Simulations of Realistic Size. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2023; Article No. 2, pp 1–12.10.1145/3581784.3627041 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-510.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
27. Batatia I. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2022 · 35 · 11423
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.01410510.1103/PhysRevB.100.014105 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.22570110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.225701 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.016089810.1063/5.0160898 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
32. Paszke A. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2019 · 32 · 8024
33. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0240510.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
39. Johansson, A.; Musaelian, A. pair_allegro; https://github.com/mir-group/pair_allegro. 2023; https://github.com/mir-group/pair_allegro, accessed September 4, 2024.
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
41. 10.1002/adts.20190001510.1002/adts.201900015 ↗
42. McCluskey, A. R.; Coles, S. W.; Morgan, B. J. Accurate Estimation of Diffusion Coefficients and their Uncertainties from Computer Simulation arXiv preprint 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18244, accessed September 4, 2024.
43. 10.7566/JPSJ.92.01200110.7566/JPSJ.92.012001 ↗
44. 10.1088/1361-648X/acd83110.1088/1361-648X/acd831 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.10411110.1103/PhysRevB.87.104111 ↗
46. 10.21105/joss.0615010.21105/joss.06150 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0090410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00904 ↗
48. 10.1039/D1EE01509E10.1039/D1EE01509E ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0056310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0347410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03474 ↗
51. 10.1088/0022-3719/14/20/01210.1088/0022-3719/14/20/012 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0127110.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01271 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.10430910.1103/PhysRevB.101.104309 ↗