Machine Learning Models for High Explosive Crystal Density and Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The rate of discovery of new explosives with superior energy density and performance has largely stalled. Rapid property prediction through machine learning has the potential to accelerate the discovery of new molecules by screening of large numbers of molecules before they are ever synthesized. To support this goal, we assembled a 21,000-molecule database of experimentally synthesized molecules containing energetic functional groups. Using a combination of experimental density measurements and high throughput electronic structure and atomistic calculations, we calculated detonation velocities and pressures for all 21,000 compounds. Using these values, we trained machine learning models for the prediction of density, detonation velocity and detonation pressure. Notably, our model for crystal density surpassed the accuracy of all current models and decreased the root-mean square error (RMSE) of the previous best model by 20%. This improvement in model performance relative to past works is attributed to our handling of chiral-specified Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) strings and introduction of a new molecular descriptor, MolDensity. To elucidate descriptor importance, we evaluated interpretable descriptors in terms of importance and compared the accuracy of a statistics-driven machine learning model against a model comprised of descriptors typically assumed to control material density. The inexpensive, yet highly accurate predictions from our models should enable creation of future artificial intelligence (AI) models that are able to screen large numbers (>10 6 ) of compounds to find the highest performing compounds in terms of crystal density, detonation velocity and detonation pressure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Crystallography and molecular interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
High Explosives Science and Technology, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States
Computer, Computational and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States
Funding
Laboratory Directed Research and Development
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Sobrero A. · Comptes Rendus · 1847 · 24 · 247
2. 10.3390/cryst601000510.3390/cryst6010005 ↗
3. Klapötke T. M. · 2022
4. 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-810.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.00510.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.005 ↗
6. 10.1128/aem.31.4.576-580.197610.1128/aem.31.4.576-580.1976 ↗
7. 10.1002/prep.20150009010.1002/prep.201500090 ↗
8. 10.1002/prep.20090004510.1002/prep.200900045 ↗
9. 10.1039/C8CC09653H10.1039/C8CC09653H ↗
10. 10.1002/prep.20150035110.1002/prep.201500351 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c0002210.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00022 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-3-540-72202-110.1007/978-3-540-72202-1 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10462-021-10058-410.1007/s10462-021-10058-4 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41573-019-0024-510.1038/s41573-019-0024-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.01110.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.10400910.1016/j.drudis.2024.104009 ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2801032210.3390/molecules28010322 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.enmf.2022.07.00510.1016/j.enmf.2022.07.005 ↗
19. 10.1002/adts.20210005710.1002/adts.202100057 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0139310.1021/acs.jcim.0c01393 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0131810.1021/acs.jcim.0c01318 ↗
22. 10.1186/s13321-023-00736-610.1186/s13321-023-00736-6 ↗
23. 10.1002/jcc.2094310.1002/jcc.20943 ↗
24. Davis, J. V.; Marrs, F. W.; Burch, A. C.; Lease, N.; Cawkwell, M.; Manner, V. W. Prediction of impact sensitivity, heat of formation and heat of explosion using atomic connectivity. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing, 202310.1063/12.0020520.10.1063/12.0020520 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.dt.2022.11.01110.1016/j.dt.2022.11.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10224010.1016/j.isci.2021.102240 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-018-27344-x10.1038/s41598-018-27344-x ↗
28. 10.1002/prep.20060003010.1002/prep.200600030 ↗
29. Storm C. S. · 1990
30. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0025910.1021/acs.jcim.0c00259 ↗
31. 10.1039/D2CP05339J10.1039/D2CP05339J ↗
32. 10.1002/prep.20220026410.1002/prep.202200264 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0115410.1021/acs.jcim.2c01154 ↗
34. 10.1126/sciadv.abm718510.1126/sciadv.abm7185 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0106210.1021/acs.cgd.9b01062 ↗
36. 10.1039/C8SC00903A10.1039/C8SC00903A ↗
37. 10.1063/1.506338510.1063/1.5063385 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0031210.1021/acs.jcim.1c00312 ↗
39. 10.2174/092986732566618090411361610.2174/0929867325666180904113616 ↗
40. 10.1186/s13321-017-0231-110.1186/s13321-017-0231-1 ↗
41. 10.1002/minf.20180008210.1002/minf.201800082 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0300110.1021/acs.iecr.8b03001 ↗
43. 10.1021/ci100384d10.1021/ci100384d ↗
44. 10.1186/1758-2946-3-3310.1186/1758-2946-3-33 ↗
45. 10.1002/jps.2092810.1002/jps.20928 ↗
46. Berthold, M. R.; Cebron, N.; Dill, F.; Gabriel, T. R.; Kötter, T.; Meinl, T.; Ohl, P.; Sieb, C.; Thiel, K.; Wiswedel, B.KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner. In Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008; pp 319–32610.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_38.10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_38 ↗
47. Kinney G. F. · 2013
48. 10.1016/0022-3697(70)90134-410.1016/0022-3697(70)90134-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0022-3697(71)80031-810.1016/S0022-3697(71)80031-8 ↗
50. 10.1007/978-1-4615-3394-8_510.1007/978-1-4615-3394-8_5 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.506338510.1063/1.5063385 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.726010.1103/PhysRevB.58.7260 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b0061310.1021/acs.jcim.7b00613 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.166790810.1063/1.1667908 ↗
55. 10.1002/jps.2149410.1002/jps.21494 ↗
56. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1395(199606)9:6<427::AID-POC798>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/(SICI)1099-1395(199606)9:6<427::AID-POC798>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
57. 10.1021/jp073117j10.1021/jp073117j ↗
58. 10.1002/jcc.2336910.1002/jcc.23369 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.tet.2020.13186510.1016/j.tet.2020.131865 ↗
60. 10.1021/jp811155610.1021/jp8111556 ↗
61. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00527.x10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00527.x ↗
62. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
63. Chen, T. Q.; Guestrin, C.XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; ACM, 2016; pp 785–79410.1145/2939672.2939785.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
64. 10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.8810.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
65. 10.18637/jss.v094.i0810.18637/jss.v094.i08 ↗
66. 10.1214/09-AOAS28510.1214/09-AOAS285 ↗
67. Fisher A. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2019 · 20 · 177
68. 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.201300651710.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2013006517 ↗
69. Lewis R. · 1978
70. 10.1021/ci990307l10.1021/ci990307l ↗