journal article·2024-02-13

CO2 Uptake by Microporous Carbon Aerogels Derived from Polybenzoxazine and Analogous All-Nitrogen Polybenzodiazine Aerogels

Vaibhav A. Edlabadkar, Rushi U. Soni, A. B. M. Shaheen ud Doulah, Stephen Y. Owusu, Samuel Hackett, Joshua M. Bartels, Nicholas Leventis, Chariklia Sotiriou-Leventis

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The rapid rise of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere contributes to global warming and ocean acidification. Carbon capture is considered essential for keeping the atmospheric CO 2 levels from rising further. This work addresses the question of whether nitrogen or oxygen lining of the surfaces of carbon-based CO 2 absorbers is more efficient for CO 2 capture. Polybenzodiazine (PBDAZ) aerogels are carbon-aerogel precursors that were prepared recently (2023) as all-nitrogen structural analogues to well-known polybenzoxazine (PBO) aerogels. However, owing to the fact that the carbonization chemistries of both PBO and PBDAZ aerogels require a prior oxidative aromatization step in air at around 200–240 °C, both types of the resulting carbon (C) aerogels contained both oxygen and nitrogen in their structures. As a carryover from their polymeric aerogel precursors, C-PBDAZ aerogels included a higher weight percent of N (7–11%) relative to the C-PBO aerogels (5.2–5.7%) while both types of carbons included about the same amount of O (7–9%). Activation (etching) with CO 2 at 1000 °C removed more N than O, so the resulting etched carbon aerogels from either source (EC-PBDAZ or EC-PBO) contained about 8–9% of O and only 3.0–3.6% N. Postetching, most oxygen was situated in pyridonic and nitroxide sites (by XPS). Looking at the PBDAZ- and PBO-derived C and EC aerogels independently, whenever processing increased the O/N ratio within each material, the CO 2 uptake (at 273 K, 1 bar) also increased, reaching 11.5 mmol g –1 in EC-PBDAZ and 4.6 mmol g –1 in EC-PBO aerogels, starting from 7.0 mmol g –1 by C-PBDAZ and 3.0 mmol g –1 by C-PBO. Subsequently, by eliminating the relative pore volumes and surface areas as causing the different CO 2 uptakes by the two types of materials, the highest CO 2 uptake by the EC-PBDAZ aerogels was attributed to the pore sizes (diameters in the 3–4 nm range) in combination with the geometry of the CO 2 -surface adducts. EC-PBDAZ carbon aerogels showed high selectivity for CO 2 versus H 2 (up to 404:1─relevant to precombustion CO 2 capture) and high selectivity for CO 2 versus N 2 (up to 48:1─relevant to postcombustion CO 2 capture).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Missouri S&T, Rolla, Missouri 65409, United States

Aspen Aerogels, 30 Forbes Road, Bldg. B, Northborough, Massachusetts 01532, United States

Funding

Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; Pörtner, H. O.; Roberts, D.; Skea, J.; Shukla, P. R.; Pirani, A.; Moufouma-Okia, W.; Péan, C.; Pidcock, R.; Connors, S., 2018. Global warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 oC 2018, 1, 43–50.
2. 10.1080/16000870.2019.162007810.1080/16000870.2019.1620078 ↗
3. Kulkarni S. J. · International Journal of Research and Review · 2017 · 4 · 18
4. 10.1126/science.117224610.1126/science.1172246 ↗
5. Smit, B.; Reimer, J.; Oldenburg, C.; Bourg, I. Introduction to Carbon Capture and Sequestration: The Berkeley Lectures on Energy; Vol. 1, Imperial College Press: London, 2014, 141–162.10.1142/p911 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11290210.1016/j.rser.2022.112902 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.advmem.2022.10002510.1016/j.advmem.2022.100025 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b0848710.1021/acsami.9b08487 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10893010.1016/j.jece.2022.108930 ↗
10. 10.1002/cplu.20200007210.1002/cplu.202000072 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.2c0260410.1021/acsami.2c02604 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0039910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00399 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20200397910.1002/adfm.202003979 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0004710.1021/acscentsci.9b00047 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0233410.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02334 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10509010.1016/j.jece.2021.105090 ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2208134310.3390/molecules22081343 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja512382f10.1021/ja512382f ↗
19. 10.1021/ie202325p10.1021/ie202325p ↗
20. 10.1038/nature0078510.1038/nature00785 ↗
21. 10.1039/b600349d10.1039/b600349d ↗
22. 10.1002/chem.20040086010.1002/chem.200400860 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0236410.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02364 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.06.01310.1016/j.apcata.2006.06.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.12.04410.1016/j.cattod.2010.12.044 ↗
26. 10.1021/cm990196610.1021/cm9901966 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0417010.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04170 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b0191010.1021/acsami.7b01910 ↗
29. 10.1039/C7RA10958J10.1039/C7RA10958J ↗
30. 10.1021/cm403483p10.1021/cm403483p ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.08010.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.080 ↗
32. 10.1039/c3ra43717e10.1039/c3ra43717e ↗
33. Rhine, W.; Wang, J.; Begag, R. Polyimide aerogels, Carbon aerogels, and Metal Carbide aerogels and Methods of Making Same. U.S. Patent No. 7,074,880 B2 (07–11–2006).
34. 10.1021/cm401623h10.1021/cm401623h ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0311710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03117 ↗
36. 10.1021/cm102891d10.1021/cm102891d ↗
37. 10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80436-310.1016/S0022-3093(05)80436-3 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20039002010.1002/adma.200390020 ↗
39. 10.1021/cm801428p10.1021/cm801428p ↗
40. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0040810.1021/acsapm.9b00408 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0279710.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02797 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20110029110.1002/adfm.201100291 ↗
43. 10.1002/pi.440710.1002/pi.4407 ↗
44. 10.1002/macp.20180033310.1002/macp.201800333 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.02310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.023 ↗
46. 10.1021/ma00211a00910.1021/ma00211a009 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja01236a04710.1021/ja01236a047 ↗
48. 10.1016/0008-6223(89)90078-X10.1016/0008-6223(89)90078-X ↗
49. 10.1252/jcej.16.47010.1252/jcej.16.470 ↗
50. 10.1021/la980198p10.1021/la980198p ↗
51. Webb, P. A.; Orr, C. Analytical Methods in Fine Particle Technology; Micromeritics Instrument Corporation: Norcross, GA, 1997; pp 81–87.
52. 10.1021/je100973t10.1021/je100973t ↗
53. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.00710.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.007 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.04.01010.1016/j.cattod.2009.04.010 ↗
55. 10.1039/C2TA00388K10.1039/C2TA00388K ↗
56. 10.1039/C4TA06539E10.1039/C4TA06539E ↗
57. 10.1021/la960022s10.1021/la960022s ↗
58. 10.1142/9781783263295_000710.1142/9781783263295_0007 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.00410.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.004 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.05010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.050 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.11985410.1016/j.energy.2021.119854 ↗
62. 10.1039/D0DT01784A10.1039/D0DT01784A ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.08610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.086 ↗
64. 10.4236/ajac.2013.410A300210.4236/ajac.2013.410A3002 ↗
65. 10.1002/chem.20130349310.1002/chem.201303493 ↗
66. 10.1021/i160075a00510.1021/i160075a005 ↗
67. 10.1021/ie302056f10.1021/ie302056f ↗
68. 10.1039/c1jm12522b10.1039/c1jm12522b ↗
69. 10.1021/jz502032c10.1021/jz502032c ↗
70. 10.1021/jacs.3c0387010.1021/jacs.3c03870 ↗
71. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry (Eds: M. B. Smith, J. March); John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp 3–31.
72. 10.1021/jacs.9b0556710.1021/jacs.9b05567 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0660510.1021/acs.est.6b06605 ↗
74. 10.1155/2016/154327310.1155/2016/1543273 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14524010.1016/j.cej.2023.145240 ↗
76. 10.1002/advs.20210547710.1002/advs.202105477 ↗
77. 10.1088/1361-6501/aad49a10.1088/1361-6501/aad49a ↗
78. 10.1021/jacs.2c0981810.1021/jacs.2c09818 ↗
79. Yoon D. · 2012 · 19110.1007/978-3-642-20620-7_9 ↗
80. Dainty J. C. · 2013 · 9
81. 10.1002/pi.440710.1002/pi.4407 ↗
82. 10.3390/nano1223428110.3390/nano12234281 ↗
83. Sing, K. S. W.; Rouquerol, F.; Rouquerol, J. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids (Eds: Rouquerol, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. S. W.; Llewellyn, P.; Maurin, G.), Academic Press: Oxford, 2014; pp 159–163.10.1016/B978-0-08-097035-6.00005-X ↗
84. 10.1007/s10934-010-9371-710.1007/s10934-010-9371-7 ↗