journal article·2024-10-08Open access

Multi-Scale Computational Design of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Carbon Capture Using Machine Learning and Multi-Objective Optimization

Zijun Deng, Lev Sarkisov

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 19

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In this article, we computationally design a series of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) optimized for postcombustion carbon capture. Our workflow includes assembling building blocks and topologies into an initial set of hypothetical MOFs, using genetic algorithms to optimize this initial set for high CO 2 /N 2 selectivity, and further evaluating the top materials through process-level modeling of their performance in a modified Skarstrom cycle. We identify two groups of MOFs that exhibit excellent process performance: one with relatively small pores in the range of 3–5 Å and another with larger pores of 6–30 Å. The performance of the first group is driven effectively by the exclusion of N 2 from adsorption, with binding sites able to accommodate only CO 2 molecules. The second group, with larger pores, features binding sites where CO 2 molecules form multiple interactions with oxygen and functional groups of several building blocks, leading to a high CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. Within the employed process model and its assumptions, the materials generated in this study substantially outperform 13X reference zeolites, in silico optimized ion-exchanged LTA zeolites, and CALF-20. While this study does not address the synthesizability, stability, or water interactions of the proposed materials, it marks a significant step forward in developing practical MOFs for carbon capture in three key areas. First, it introduces a generative workflow based on the process-level performance of new materials. Second, it identifies structural features of optimal MOFs for carbon capture, which can serve as design guidelines for future development. Finally, the potential existence of numerous promising materials offers hope that some may progress to laboratory testing and eventual scale-up.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Sackville Street, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. DOE Technical System Targets: Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2017. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-vehicles (accessed May 6, 2024).
2. 10.1039/c3ee42350f10.1039/c3ee42350f ↗
3. 10.1039/C8CS00829A10.1039/C8CS00829A ↗
4. 10.1107/S205252061600395410.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0044110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
6. 10.1038/nchem.119210.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.1c0247110.1021/acsami.1c02471 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4CS00070F10.1039/C4CS00070F ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21347010.1016/j.ccr.2020.213470 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja210823910.1021/ja2108239 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat333610.1038/nmat3336 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4EE02636E10.1039/C4EE02636E ↗
13. Altintas, C.; Erucar, I.; Keskin, S.;Computational Screening of MOFs for CO2 Capture. In Metal-Organic Frameworks in Biomedical and Environmental Field , Horcajada Cortés, P., Rojas Macías, S.Eds. 2021; 20523810.1007/978-3-030-63380-6_6 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0306510.1021/acs.iecr.8b03065 ↗
15. 10.1039/D0ME00060D10.1039/D0ME00060D ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13539510.1016/j.cej.2022.135395 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14159710.1016/j.cej.2023.141597 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14103510.1016/j.cej.2022.141035 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41586-024-07683-810.1038/s41586-024-07683-8 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0126610.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0000410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.21511210.1016/j.ccr.2023.215112 ↗
23. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3710.1038/natrevmats.2017.37 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41586-019-1798-710.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21348710.1016/j.ccr.2020.213487 ↗
26. 10.1080/08927022.2019.159727110.1080/08927022.2019.1597271 ↗
27. 10.1126/sciadv.aax932410.1126/sciadv.aax9324 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0233910.1021/acs.iecr.0c02339 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0453310.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04533 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0062310.1021/acs.jcim.9b00623 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0116710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01167 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8ME00050F10.1039/C8ME00050F ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1076610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10766 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0169210.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01692 ↗
36. 10.48550/arXiv.1301.378110.48550/arXiv.1301.3781 ↗
37. 10.1039/D1TA03129E10.1039/D1TA03129E ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0182210.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01822 ↗
39. 10.1039/d4dd00010b10.1039/d4dd00010b ↗
40. 10.1126/sciadv.160090910.1126/sciadv.1600909 ↗
41. 10.1038/s42256-020-00271-110.1038/s42256-020-00271-1 ↗
42. 10.48550/arXiv.2310.1073210.48550/arXiv.2310.10732 ↗
43. 10.1038/s42004-023-01090-210.1038/s42004-023-01090-2 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0084810.1021/acs.cgd.7b00848 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jced.9b0083510.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
46. 10.1021/ar800124u10.1021/ar800124u ↗
47. BIOVIA.Dassault Systémes Biovia Materials Studio 2019 ; Dassault Systèmes: San Diego, 2019.
48. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
49. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
51. 10.1021/j100031a03410.1021/j100031a034 ↗
52. 10.1080/0026897800010361110.1080/00268978000103611 ↗
53. 10.1021/jp002866x10.1021/jp002866x ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c0122910.1021/acs.jctc.0c01229 ↗
55. 10.1039/C6RA04656H10.1039/C6RA04656H ↗
56. 10.1039/C6RA05507A10.1039/C6RA05507A ↗
57. 10.1039/C7RA07400J10.1039/C7RA07400J ↗
58. 10.1021/j100367a05610.1021/j100367a056 ↗
59. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.299056710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567 ↗
60. Mikolov, T.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.; Dean, J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, 2013 arXiv:1301.3781. arXiv.
61. 10.1016/s1570-8659(00)07005-810.1016/s1570-8659(00)07005-8 ↗
62. 10.1006/jcph.1994.118710.1006/jcph.1994.1187 ↗
63. MATLAB . version R2022a; The MathWorks Inc., 2022.
64. Siderius, D.; Shen, V.; Johnson III, R.; van Zee, R. NIST/ARPA-E Database of Novel and Emerging Adsorbent Materials ; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2014, T43882.
65. 10.1126/science.abi728110.1126/science.abi7281 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41467-024-48136-010.1038/s41467-024-48136-0 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13626310.1016/j.cej.2022.136263 ↗
68. 10.1002/chem.20110229510.1002/chem.201102295 ↗
69. 10.1021/jacs.6b0534510.1021/jacs.6b05345 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14205810.1016/j.cej.2023.142058 ↗
71. 10.1021/ja027697410.1021/ja0276974 ↗
72. 10.1021/ja202154j10.1021/ja202154j ↗
73. 10.1038/nature1743010.1038/nature17430 ↗
74. 10.1002/cphc.20100059010.1002/cphc.201000590 ↗
75. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0893310.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08933 ↗