Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of pure and Cu-doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared under Co-precipitation method
Source abstract
Abstract
The key goal of this study is to innovate the pure and 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 wt.% of Cudoped ZnO NPs through co-precipitation technique. PXRD pattern shows the hexagonal crystal structure with no any phase impurity were observed for all the synthesized samples. From UV-Vis DRS spectra, band gap was obtained as 3.18, 3.24, 3.29 and 3.33 eV respectively for undoped, Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 wt.%). From SEM analysis, the agglomeration of rod-like morphology for pure ZnO NPs, spherical-like morphology for Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.05 wt.%) and flake-like morphology for Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.10 wt.%) and flower-like morphology for Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.15 wt.%). The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized NPs was studied by the dye degradation of Methylene Blue (MB) under UV irradiation. The result exposed that, 0.15 wt.% of Cu-doped ZnO NPs is found to have efficient degradation candidate materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] N. Senthilkumar, E. Vivek, M. Shankar, M. Meena, M. Vimalan, I. Vetha Potheher, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 29, 2927 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8223-510.1007/s10854-017-8223-5 ↗
2. [2] A. T. Ravichandran, R. Karthick, A. Robert Xavier, R. Chandramohan, Srinivas Mantha, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 28, 6643 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6355-210.1007/s10854-017-6355-2 ↗
3. [3] O.Lupan, G.A. Emelchenko, V.V. Ursaki, G. Chai, A.N. Redkin, A.N. Gruzintsev, I.M Tiginyanu, L. Chow, L.K Ono, B. Roldan Uenya, H. Heinrich, E.E. Yakimov, Mater. Res. Bull. 45, 1026 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.03.02710.1016/j.materresbull.2010.03.027 ↗
4. [4] C. Belkhaoui, N. Mzabi, H.Smaoui, Mater. Res. Bullet. 111, 70 (2029); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.11.00610.1016/j.materresbull.2018.11.006 ↗
5. [5] Manish Mittal, Manoj Sharma, O.P. Pandey, Sol. Energy. 110, 386 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.02610.1016/j.solener.2014.09.026 ↗
6. [6] K.V. Karthik, A.V. Raghu, Kakarla Raghava Reddy, R. Ravishankar, M. Sangeeta, Nagaraj P. Shetti, Ch Venkata Reddy, Chemosphere 287, 132081 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13208110.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132081 ↗
7. [7] V. Shanmugam, K.S.Jeyaperumal, Applied Surface Science, 449, 617 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.167[8] Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani, R., Rezaee, A., Khataee, A., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 14133 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie402478p10.1021/ie402478p ↗
8. [9] L. Zheng, C. Chen, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhan, Y. Cao, X. Lin, J. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 148, 44 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.04210.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.042 ↗
9. [10] Saravanan Selvaraj, M. Krishna Mohan, M. Navaneethan, S. Ponnusamy, C. Muthamizhchelvan, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 103, 104622 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.10462210.1016/j.mssp.2019.104622 ↗
10. [11] K.G. Kanade, B.B. Kale, Jin-Ook Baeg, Sang Mi Lee, Chul Wee Lee, Sang-Jin Moona, Hyunju Chang, Mater. Chem. Phys.102 98 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.01210.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.012 ↗
11. [12] Prasad N, Karthikeyan B, Vacuum, 146, 501 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.02810.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.028 ↗
12. [13] N. Prasad, V. M. M, Saipavitra, H. Swaminathan, et al., Appl. Phys. A 122, 590 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0121-910.1007/s00339-016-0121-9 ↗
13. [14] S. Muthukumaran, R. Gopalakrishnan, Optical Materials 34, 1946 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2012.06.00410.1016/j.optmat.2012.06.004 ↗
14. [15] R. Elilarassi, G. Chandrasekaran, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 21, 1168 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-009-0041-y10.1007/s10854-009-0041-y ↗
15. [16] Talaat M. Hammad, Jamil K. Salem, Roger G. Harrison, Rolf Hempelmann, Nasser K. Hejazy, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 24, 2846 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-013-1181-710.1007/s10854-013-1181-7 ↗
16. [17] T. Srinivasulu, K. Saritha and K.T. Ramakrishna Reddy, Modern Electron. Mater. 3(2), 76 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.moem.2017.07.00110.1016/j.moem.2017.07.001 ↗
17. [18] R Raji, K G Gopchandran, Mater. Res. Express 4, 025002 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa576210.1088/2053-1591/aa5762 ↗
18. [19] L. Ben Saad, L. Soltane, F. Sediri, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 2782 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602441913025910.1134/S0036024419130259 ↗
19. [20] Sabbaghan, Maryam; Nadafan, Marzieh; Lamei, Hamid Reza, Optical Materials, 111, 110679 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.11067910.1016/j.optmat.2020.110679 ↗
20. [21] P.D. Sahare, V. Kumar, Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 3, 2278 (2013).