journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of pure and Cu-doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared under Co-precipitation method

Department of Physics, Sona College of Technology, Salem – 636005, India, V. Balasubramanian, R. Jeyachitra, Department of Physics, Kalaignar Karunanidhi Institute of Technology, Coimbatore-641402, T.S. Senthil, Department of Physics, Erode Sengunthar Engineering College, Perundurai 638057, Tamil Nadu, India, S. Kalpana, Department of Physics, Saveetha Engineering College, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India

Journal of Ovonic Research· Volume 20· Issue 1

Abstract

The key goal of this study is to innovate the pure and 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 wt.% of Cudoped ZnO NPs through co-precipitation technique. PXRD pattern shows the hexagonal crystal structure with no any phase impurity were observed for all the synthesized samples. From UV-Vis DRS spectra, band gap was obtained as 3.18, 3.24, 3.29 and 3.33 eV respectively for undoped, Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 wt.%). From SEM analysis, the agglomeration of rod-like morphology for pure ZnO NPs, spherical-like morphology for Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.05 wt.%) and flake-like morphology for Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.10 wt.%) and flower-like morphology for Cu-doped ZnO NPs (0.15 wt.%). The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized NPs was studied by the dye degradation of Methylene Blue (MB) under UV irradiation. The result exposed that, 0.15 wt.% of Cu-doped ZnO NPs is found to have efficient degradation candidate materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] N. Senthilkumar, E. Vivek, M. Shankar, M. Meena, M. Vimalan, I. Vetha Potheher, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 29, 2927 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8223-510.1007/s10854-017-8223-5 ↗
2. [2] A. T. Ravichandran, R. Karthick, A. Robert Xavier, R. Chandramohan, Srinivas Mantha, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 28, 6643 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6355-210.1007/s10854-017-6355-2 ↗
3. [3] O.Lupan, G.A. Emelchenko, V.V. Ursaki, G. Chai, A.N. Redkin, A.N. Gruzintsev, I.M Tiginyanu, L. Chow, L.K Ono, B. Roldan Uenya, H. Heinrich, E.E. Yakimov, Mater. Res. Bull. 45, 1026 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.03.02710.1016/j.materresbull.2010.03.027 ↗
4. [4] C. Belkhaoui, N. Mzabi, H.Smaoui, Mater. Res. Bullet. 111, 70 (2029); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.11.00610.1016/j.materresbull.2018.11.006 ↗
5. [5] Manish Mittal, Manoj Sharma, O.P. Pandey, Sol. Energy. 110, 386 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.02610.1016/j.solener.2014.09.026 ↗
6. [6] K.V. Karthik, A.V. Raghu, Kakarla Raghava Reddy, R. Ravishankar, M. Sangeeta, Nagaraj P. Shetti, Ch Venkata Reddy, Chemosphere 287, 132081 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13208110.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132081 ↗
7. [7] V. Shanmugam, K.S.Jeyaperumal, Applied Surface Science, 449, 617 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.167[8] Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani, R., Rezaee, A., Khataee, A., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 14133 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie402478p10.1021/ie402478p ↗
8. [9] L. Zheng, C. Chen, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhan, Y. Cao, X. Lin, J. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 148, 44 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.04210.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.042 ↗
9. [10] Saravanan Selvaraj, M. Krishna Mohan, M. Navaneethan, S. Ponnusamy, C. Muthamizhchelvan, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 103, 104622 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.10462210.1016/j.mssp.2019.104622 ↗
10. [11] K.G. Kanade, B.B. Kale, Jin-Ook Baeg, Sang Mi Lee, Chul Wee Lee, Sang-Jin Moona, Hyunju Chang, Mater. Chem. Phys.102 98 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.01210.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.012 ↗
11. [12] Prasad N, Karthikeyan B, Vacuum, 146, 501 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.02810.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.028 ↗
12. [13] N. Prasad, V. M. M, Saipavitra, H. Swaminathan, et al., Appl. Phys. A 122, 590 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0121-910.1007/s00339-016-0121-9 ↗
13. [14] S. Muthukumaran, R. Gopalakrishnan, Optical Materials 34, 1946 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2012.06.00410.1016/j.optmat.2012.06.004 ↗
14. [15] R. Elilarassi, G. Chandrasekaran, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 21, 1168 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-009-0041-y10.1007/s10854-009-0041-y ↗
15. [16] Talaat M. Hammad, Jamil K. Salem, Roger G. Harrison, Rolf Hempelmann, Nasser K. Hejazy, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 24, 2846 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-013-1181-710.1007/s10854-013-1181-7 ↗
16. [17] T. Srinivasulu, K. Saritha and K.T. Ramakrishna Reddy, Modern Electron. Mater. 3(2), 76 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.moem.2017.07.00110.1016/j.moem.2017.07.001 ↗
17. [18] R Raji, K G Gopchandran, Mater. Res. Express 4, 025002 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa576210.1088/2053-1591/aa5762 ↗
18. [19] L. Ben Saad, L. Soltane, F. Sediri, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 2782 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602441913025910.1134/S0036024419130259 ↗
19. [20] Sabbaghan, Maryam; Nadafan, Marzieh; Lamei, Hamid Reza, Optical Materials, 111, 110679 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.11067910.1016/j.optmat.2020.110679 ↗
20. [21] P.D. Sahare, V. Kumar, Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 3, 2278 (2013).